February 2010

Our Moratoria Story Makes Master Resource Blog - Tony Palmer Seeks Alignment With All Producers

26 February 2010 6:00am

Master Resource by Dave Harbour.  At the NARUC Winter Meeting in Washington D.C. last week, a Study Group composed of regulatory commissioners, consultants, government and university economists, and non-profit association sponsors released their energy research report: ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF MAINTAINING OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION MORATORIA ON AND BENEATH FEDERAL LANDS.  (See our earlier NGP Moratoria Stories herehere, and here.)  (Assessment of the Combined Relative Impacts of Maintaining Moratoria and Increased Domestic Onshore and Offshore Oil and Gas Resource Estimates).   *   Related PNA story on Moratoria Study by Alan Bailey (NGP Photo).  Research downloads Here.  Go here to review significant, national media coverage.

 

Tony Palmer Addresses Alliance

Report and Commentary by

Dave Harbour

 

Yesterday, TransCanada's Vice President of Alaska Development, Tony Palmer (NGP Photo), told Alaska Support Industry Alliance (Alliance) members that his company's gas pipeline contract with the State of Alaska included, "significant risks and significant benefits".  View his slides, here.

 

The contract to which he referred arises from legislation known as AGIA, the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, which provides TransCanada with financial "inducement" (Sec. 43.90.110) and other benefits in preparing its application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to own and operate an interstate, Alaska natural gas pipeline.  AGIA is also replete with requirements to be met by the licensee, TransCanada.

In answer to my question as to whether TransCanada would be willing to immunize the State against the treble damages clause (Sec. 43.90.440) included in the contract, in conjunction with construction of an in-state 'bullet line' to Southcentral Alaska, Palmer said it would not.  He said the parties entered into the contract in good faith and if one party wishes to terminate the contract there are provisions within the contract for doing so. 

Note: a few days later in Calgary, Palmer said, ""We believe the best and most effective way to bring the project forward is in the alignment of five key parties: the state of Alaska, the three major North Slope producers and TransCanada," said Tony Palmer, TransCanada's vice-president of Alaska development."    *    New Brunswick Business Journal (CP) by Lauren Krugel.  Tony Palmer, TransCanada's vice-president of Alaska development, said having government and industry on the same page for a project of this scale is critical.  "... knowing the rules of the game is always important," he told reporters at the conference.  ... "We're pleased today that we are aligned - ExxonMobil, TransCanada and the state of Alaska. We do believe that the best way to advance the project is to align BP and Conoco with us as well," he said.

Meanwhile, today Rena Delbridge of the Alaska Dispatch reports that, "With a large-diameter gas pipeline uncertain and years out, some lawmakers want to put an in-state natural gas pipeline on the fast track by turning plans over to the Alaska Railroad.    While a huge pipeline such as TransCanada is proposing could link Alaska's natural gas with North American markets, flow is still a decade away, and only if major hurdles are overcome."  Though details associated with such an in-state effort may not be sufficient to trigger the treble damages clause of the AGIA contract, such effort could give rise to arguable ambiguity and allegations of contract violation.  There is not question about the honorable and diligent effort TransCanada has brought to its obligations under AGIA.  But the intensity and chaos emanating from Juneau surrounding state spending, saving, gas pipeline, tax issues should be sufficient to keep TransCanada as alert to mischief--in this election year--as North Slope producers and Southeast Cruise line operators must be.  After all, unpredictability of government action is one of the very worst deterrents to investment and I believe no one would dispute that Alaska has become in the last several years one of the most unpredictable investment climates anywhere.  

Tax Issues Dominate Legislative Session Attention

24 February 2010 9:05am

See Our Related Editorial: The Legislature should amend a current bill or introduce a new one which 1) at the least, eliminated the oil production tax progressivity feature and lowered the net tax rate from 25%, and 2) repealed the cruise ship tax and burdensome environmental requirements or, at the least, reduced the head tax from $50 to $5 and eliminated all other burdens established by the cruise ship voters initiative. –dh 

The Alaska Standard by Dan Fagan.  Let me get this straight. Our current crop of legislators have at worst, killed the gaspipeline, at best, they’ve delayed it at least three years with the silliness that is AGIA.  This bunch is also responsible for doing nothing about a cruise ship initiative that is driving away passengers in droves. The cruise ship industry averaged in recent years spending $75,000,000 a year promoting Alaska globally. But since the initiative passed (backed by environmentalists and unions hoping to get a sweetheart deal) the industry this year will spend fewer than 17 million promoting our state. $75 million to $17 million overnight. What have lawmakers done to fix the problem? Squat!  ... So we are closed for business in Alaska and what are our fearless leaders working on? Raising the limit to how much free stuff they can get.   ...    North Pole Republican Sen. John Coghill (NGP Photo), a man who should wake up every day feeling awful about the fact that he voted in favor of ACES and that vote has left more than 2000 families with many more coming out of work, is leading the effort to raise the $15 dollar cap.   Related ADN Story by Sean Cockerham.     *     ADN by Lisa Demer.  ...senators on the Finance Committee -- which would have a major role in any change in oil taxes -- are sifting through conflicting perspectives and colliding PowerPoint presentations generated during days of hearings on Alaska's oil and gas taxes.  About 87 percent of the state's general fund revenue comes from oil taxes, but North Slope production is declining, and senators are assessing the tax's impact.  The stakes are extremely high," said state Sen. Bert Stedman (NGP Photo), a Republican from Sitka who co-chairs the Finance Committee. "If the trend is as negative as the industry portrays it in Prudhoe and Kuparuk, we'll see significant reductions in production, which means effects on our treasury."     *     Alaska Dispatch by Rena Delbridge.  A week's worth of hearings on the state's oil tax hasn't done much to resolve a debate dominating the legislative session and this year's gubernatorial race.  Is the state's oil tax, Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share (ACES), working as planned to spur investment in North Slope oil fields, spinning off a boon of high-paying jobs and a continuing flood of money into state coffers?  Or does the tax hinder investment by offering too little reward for the risk companies take spending millions, putting future oil development -- and the state's share -- at risk?

Another Moratoria Report Story - Cook Inlet Gas Political Strategy

23 February 2010 9:01am

See our earlier moratoria study stories here, and here.

SNL Daily Gas Report, by Mark Hand.  Continued restrictions on industry access to oil and gas resources on federal lands could cost the United States more than $2.35 trillion in cumulative gross domestic product and nearly 13 million jobs through 2030, according to the results of a new study administered by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners...On Feb. 15, members of the Moratoria Study Group discussed the report at NARUC's winter committee meetings in Washington, D.C. The members went to great lengths to tout the report's fairness and balance. Hamilton emphasized that the study resulted in "a very unbiased report," while Dave Harbour, moratoria study group vice chairman and a former regulatory commissioner from Alaska, said the report was "not colored by bias."John Broderick, moratoria study group official observer and senior economist at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, said he considered the report "a very balanced work." He added: "It's not just an industry study." Bob Pickett (NGP Photo), chairman of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and a moratoria study group participant, said that when he agreed to join the group, he initially thought "this has the potential to be controversial." But he said he ended up impressed with the study's dedication to the model used in its forecasts and with how the study considered the interests of businesses.

Alaska Dispatch by Rena Delbridge.  On Cook Inlet natural gas: "...years of massive tax credits for oil and gas production in Cook Inlet haven't gotten the state far. Production is on the decline and deliverability during peak times isn't a sure thing in Southcentral."

Governor Defends Alaska Resource Interests - More Tax Talk Today Will Likely Not Support Gas Pipeline Investor Certainty - Sierra Club's Mackenzie Pipeline Map

22 February 2010 6:05am

 

As a member of the NGA’s Natural Resources Committee, Governor Sean Parnell (State Photo) participated in a hearing with U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu and the Federal Energy Regulatory Board Chairman Jon Wellinghoff (NGP Photo). Governor Parnell led the effort to amend an Endangered Species Act resolution to put more emphasis on local decision-making and economic development in land use planning decisions.  “I will continue fighting to ensure that jobs and economic recovery take a front seat in any discussions,” said Governor Parnell.

 

Here is the Sierra Club's Mackenzie Pipeline map (Right).

Note today's KTOO Schedule:  (Comment: We observe that most but not all of Alaska's leaders seem too obsessed with reelection and the 'shortness of the Legislative session' to do anything meaningful in 2010 that supports investor interest in an Alaska North Slope gas pipeline.  By taking little (tax credits/tax relief restricted to future investment) or no action this year, our leaders will--in effect--delay pipeline construction by another year, at best.  Here's why.  Even if open season results are promising but contingent on the Alaska government providing fiscal certainty, investor activity will be delayed until the Legislature acts a year from now, if then.  By then, competing gas projects in North America and throughout the world will have gained momentum and companies that bid for capacity this year may not maintain interest--even conditionally--through next year.  Leaders should bite the bullet this year and pass legislation which provides fiscal certainty for investors, a state fiscal plan and deals with the onerous tax and investment climate they have created.  Is it likely they will do so?  No.  Is it therefore likely that gas pipeline investor activity will be discouraged.  Sadly, yes.  -dh)

9:00 am    Senate Finance Committee 
Senate Finance 532
Audio stream will be available when the meeting starts.
Production Tax Review: Tax Rates, Net Profit Sharing, Government Take Gas Value Under ACES Tax Provisions 

Dept of Revenue & other Administrative Representatives -- Testimony --
(TV coverage is planned)

Petroleum News Alaska by Wesley Loy.  A judge has ordered a temporary halt to the Point Thomson case pending the state’s appeal of a recent unfavorable ruling to the Alaska Supreme Court.  (Comment: How does this controversy support investor interest in committing to construction of a gas pipeline?  -dh)  *   Journal of Commerce by Tim Bradner.  Rep. Mark Nueman, co-chair of the Resources Committee, asked Tony Palmer (NGP Photo) about uncertainties of approvals of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of gas production volumes for Point Thomson. Those are not established yet because the state conservation commission must assess losses of liquid condensate recovery at Point Thomson, as reservoir pressures decline with gas production.  A reduction in volume or delay in taking Point Thomson gas because of condensate loss could affect the project, Palmer said.     *     Alaska Dispatch by Brad Keithly.  "Plan B, If The Big Line Fails."    (Comment:  Connect the dots.  -dh)

Solve Climate.  Today's decisions by oil giants BP and ConocoPhillips to pull out of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership along with equipment maker Caterpillar wiped some big names off the roster of the influential industry-environment partnership.  (Comment: We congratulate BP, Caterpillar and ConocoPhillips for having the courage to withdraw from a coalition whose unintended consequence would be the further erosion of America's economy, way of life and national defense.  -dh)

After the 'Moratoria Report'

18 February 2010 4:09am

"After the Oil and Gas Moratoria Report...."

Notes From: Dave Harbour, reporting from Washington D.C.

 (See Related Stories Over the Next Week, latest)

 

Monday, a Study Group composed of regulatory commissioners, consultants, government and university economists and non-profit association sponsors met to deliver their energy research report, responding to a National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) resolution issued in July 2007 (our earlier story), entitled, "Developing Reliable Research Regarding the Social, Economic and Environmental Effects of Maintaining Domestic Energy Exploration and Production Moratoria On and Beneath Federal Lands."  The forum was NARUC's Winter Meeting in Washington D.C, 

The report (Executive Summary available here), increased government estimates of the U.S. domestic natural gas resource base from 1748 Trillion Cubic Feet (Tcf) to 2034 Tcf, and increased the estimate of crude oil resources from 186 billion barrels of oil (Bbo) to 229 Bbo.   It also revealed that the cost to American citizens of not developing resources could result in increased energy imports, increased gassoline, natural gas and electricity prices, along with decreased jobs, gross domestic product and family disposable income. 

Opening NARUC's Committee on Gas meeting last Monday, Chairman O'Neal Hamilton (NGP Photo, upper-l) reported on the over two-year-long effort undertaken to complete the research project envisioned by the organization's resolution.  He introduced your author, who as a commissioner emeritus served as the Study Group's volunteer vice chairman.  After hearing about the research process employed by the Study Group, the Gas Committee members received a briefing of the research results from Rick Irby (NGP Photo, above-r), of the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).  Irby, the study's project manager was supported by Jay Ratafia-Brown (NGP Photo below), the lead author and researcher..

Other Study Group participants gave individual perspectives about the value of the study to the country.  These included Jenny Fordham, Natural Gas Supply Association (NGP Photo-l) and her associate, David Murphy;  Chris McGill, American Gas Association (NGP Photo-r), John Broderick, Bureau of Land Management; Grace Soderberg, Edison Electric Institute; Regulatory Commission of Alaska Chairman Bob PickettDr. Michelle Foss, of the University of Texas Center for Energy Economics, Bureau of Economic Geology; and David Holt, President of the Consumer Energy Alliance; Commissioner Emeritus Don Mason, Louie Binswanger, TECO.   

Wednesday, NARUC's board of directors adopted a resolution acknowledging completion of the almost 2-year long study.

After the board action, Study Group Chairman Hamilton said:  "Our Moratoria Study Group is pleased to provide the Congress, the President and the American people with the most current and complete estimate of domestic oil and gas resources along with an analysis of the social, economic and environmental effects of not developing energy resources on federal lands." 
 
Resource links:
 

 

Other reports:

Alaska Business Monthly: NARUC Gas Committee Receives Final Report Detailing Oil/Gas Moratoria Impacts 

Alaska Source Link.  NARUC receives final report....

Association of Corporate Counsel - Lexology -Dot- Com: A report issued by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) concludes that continuing oil and natural gas exploration and production moratoria off the U.S. East Coast would likely have significant negative effects on the U.S. economy. The model used in the study predicts, among other things, that by 2030, U.S. crude oil production will decrease by 15% annually, oil imports from OPEC countries will increase 19%, and U.S. gross domestic product will decrease on average 0.52% each year. A copy of the report's executive summary can be foundhere

The American Gas Association (AGA) today (2-15-10) commended the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) for administering a study that closely examines the financial, social and environmental impacts of our nation’s oil and natural gas moratoria. 

Bloomberg News: Drilling Bans to Cost U.S. $2.36 Trillion, Industry Study Says (Note: This headline could be misleading; the study was initiated as a public interest project by the nation's regulatory commissioners who asked for and received financial and volunteer support from a variety of government and university experts along with private companies and non-profit associations.  -dh)  Another Bloomberg story by Daniel Whitten.

Colorado Springs Utilities.  Washington, DC – The American Gas Association (AGA) today commended the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) for administering a study that closely examines the financial, social and environmental impacts of our nation’s oil and natural gas moratoria. 

Congressman Bill Cassidy.  According to the NARUC study released Monday, maintaining the current moratoria on onshore and offshore energy production until 2030 will:

  • Result in the loss of 13 million jobs in the energy economy
  • Increase consumer energy costs by $2.35 trillion cumulatively
  • Increase natural gas prices by 17 percent
  • Increase electricity prices by 5 percent
  • Increase gasoline prices by 3 percent
  • Reduce Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $2.36 trillion.
  • Reduce domestic crude oil production by 9.9 billion barrels – an average annual decrease of nearly 15 percent
  • Decrease domestic natural gas production by 46 Tcf – an average annual decrease of nearly 9 percent
  • Increase imports from OPEC by 4.1 billion barrels, resulting in cumulative payments to OPEC of $607 billion.
  • Increase natural gas imports by nearly 15.7 Tcf – an average annual increase of almost 75 percent.

Citizens for Growth Facebook.  New Study Reinforces Need to Responsibly Develop Domestic Energy Offshore Consumer group calls untapped domestic oil and gas resources “a game-changer” for the economy....

Consumer Energy Alliance.  America’s reliance on foreign countries for its energy will grow by 19 percent over the next 20 years, accelerating the transfer of U.S. wealth to members of OPEC by more than $600 billion. That’s just one of the startling conclusions found in a new report issued today by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) at the group’s winter meeting in Washington – all, assuming a scenario in which policy-makers keep intact decades-old restrictions on accessing America’s abundant, available energy resources.

Craigs List - Sacramento.  What Did the Study Find?  If the Federal government never allows access to the lands previously under moratoria, the study projects, there will be fewer jobs, lower economic output, higher energy prices, more oil and natural gas imports, and larger outlays to the Organization of Petroleum Exporters (OPEC). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will be $2.36 trillion less between 2009 and 2030, the study’s time horizon. That amounts to an average decrease of 0.52 percent annually in GDP.[v] Employment in energy intensive industries is projected to be almost 13 million jobs lower,[vi] at a time when we desperately need jobs in the United States to spur economic growth and consumer spending. 

E-Book. Gas Moratoria Report.

Elowonganpekerjaan, #8.  In July 2007, NARUC's Gas Committee and Board of Directors adopted a resolutionauthorizing the Association's participation in a public-private partnership to study the impact of existing moratoria against energy exploration and .... NARUC is a non-profitorganization founded in 1889 whose members include the governmental agencies that are engaged in the regulation of utilities and carriers in the fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. ... http://offshore-oil-jobs.bompus.com/new-report-impacts-of-gas-moratoria/

Energy Assurance Daily.  A public/private Study Group commissioned by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) reported February 15 the results of a two year study to determine the financial and environmental impacts of maintaining the moratoria restrictions on the development of offshore oil and gas resources in the United States.  The “Moratoria Study” used a Federal government modeling program relied upon by Congress and the Administration for analyzing the energy outlook under existing laws and projecting the impacts of new energy policy proposals.  

Energy Intelligence.  In a study released Monday, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) said the economic impacts of maintaining the moratoria would be significant and would drag down US economic growth over the next two decades.

Fox News-Dow Jones by Ian Talley.  Although Congress lifted the official 30-year moratorium for drilling on many new areas off the U.S. coast, the administration has in principle maintained the moratorium by not opening new, unscheduled areas for development. The Interior Department under the Obama Administration has held several previously-scheduled lease sales and approved two Arctic exploration licenses for blocks the industry says may have great potential.  "Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country," said O'Neal Hamilton, chairman of the NARUC study group that ordered the review.

Google Finance.  Restricted domestic production would lead to expanded oil and gas imports, "resulting in inferred increased domestic and global environmental effects associated with such imports," it noted. "The effect of maintaining domestic moratoria results in even greater domestic and global environmental effects associated with counterbalancing imports." 

On Feb 16, 9:52 am, Sugar <karlsu...@hotmail.com> wrote: 
> thanks for posting though - at least it's intelligent opinion 
> supported by facts 

Groundwork/IOGCC.  February 15, 2010 (Oil & Gas Journal) Continuing US offshore oil and gas leasing moratoriums from 2009 through 2030 would decrease US oil production by 9.9 billion bbl—or an average 15%/ year—and natural gas production by 46 tcf—or 9%/year—a study commissioned by the National Association of Regulatory Commissioners concluded. The study, which NARUC released on Feb. 15 during its 2010 winter meeting in Washington, DC, also predicted that US oil imports from members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries would climb by 4.1 billion bbl, or an average 19%/year, during 2009-30 if US offshore leasing bans continue. This would result in $607 billion more in payments to OPEC producers

IHS.  GS-1 - Developing Reliable Research Regarding the Social and Economic Costs of Maintaining Domestic Energy Exploration and Production Moratoria On and Beneath Federal Lands.  This resolution states that NARUC shall coordinate and participate with interested government, consumer, public policy, business and industry organizations to fashion for the president, Congress, and state policy makers a factual and useful study entitled: The Social, Economic and Environmental Effects on America's Citizens of Maintaining Moratoria On Domestic Energy Exploration and Production On and Beneath Federal Lands.

Inside Louisana News.  ...a new report from the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) demonstrating the economic and social economic benefits of domestic energy production.

Lexis-Nexis: Resolution Acknowledging Successful Completion of NARUC's July 18, 2007, Resolution Task Authorizing Development of, "Reliable Research Regarding the Social, Economic and Environmental Effects of Maintaining Domestic Energy Exploration and Production Moratoria On and Beneath Federal Lands"The resolution, upon recommendation of the Committee on Gas, accepts the research product in response to the July 18, 2007 Resolution; commends the Moratoria Study Group, NARUC Staff, SAIC and GTI for their combined efforts to fulfill the task set forth by the July 18, 2007 Resolution; and encourages broad distribution of the study results as specified in our original July 18, 2007 Resolution.

David Dismukes,  Advisor (2008). National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (“NARUC”). Study Committee on the Impact of Executive Drilling Moratoria on Federal Lands.

Doug Mood.  Currently serving on the NARUC study committee addressing the economic impacts of the Outer Continental Shelf Moratoria.  Oil and natural gas reserves in the OCS are enormous and the public and congress should have access to good, sound analyses of the economic impacts of this moratoria.

Doc Hastings.  According to the NARUC study, maintaining the current moratoria on both onshore and offshore energy production until 2030 will have the following projected impacts: Employment in energy intensive industries will decrease by nearly 13 million jobs. (Etc)

EnergyXXI.  Today, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) released the findings of a comprehensive study that details the impacts of continued moratoria on exploration for oil natural gas.  The study was done by experts from Science Applied International Corporation (SAIC) and the Gas Technology Institute and sponsored by a variety of organizations, including the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy.  Christopher Guith (NGP Photo), vice president for policy at the Chamber’s Energy Institute, made the following statement regarding about the study’s findings: “The report released by NARUC today confirms the need to open up more areas for exploration of oil and natural gas.  The consequences of inaction are clear: higher energy prices, more imported oil, and stunted economic growth.  “The study brings to a close more than two years of work and establishes a reliable baseline of oil and gas resources available in the United States. There is much to be learned from it—for instance, it reveals that America has 16 percent more natural gas and 23% more oil reserves than previously estimated by the Department of Energy.

Fox News.  Although Congress lifted the official 30-year moratorium for drilling on many new areas off the U.S. coast, the administration has in principle maintained the moratorium by not opening new, unscheduled areas for development. The Interior Department under the Obama Administration has held several previously-scheduled lease sales and approved two Arctic exploration licenses for blocks the industry says may have great potential.  "Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country," said O'Neal Hamilton, chairman of the NARUC study group that ordered the review.

Institute for 21st Century Energy.  Today, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) released the findings of a comprehensive study that details the impacts of continued moratoria on exploration for oil natural gas.  The study was done by experts from Science Applied International Corporation (SAIC) and the Gas Technology Institute and sponsored by a variety of organizations, including the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for 21st Century Energy.

Institute for Energy.  The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) has just released a study that looks at what these additional oil and natural gas resources would accomplish in those areas.[i] NARUC commissioned Science Applications International Corp. (a consulting and modeling company) and the Gas Technology Institute (a natural gas consulting group) to perform the study.[ii] Although the study was sponsored by electric utilities and oil and natural gas companies,[iii] its reviewers included administration officials in the Department of Energy, the Energy Information Administration, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the Bureau of Land Management.[iv]

IPAA Washington Report.  Also developing from the NARUC meeting was the release of a detailed report on the economic andproduction impacts of continued federal onshore and offshore moratoria through 2030. IPAA is a sponsor of the study.  According to NARUC, the study "results determined that maintaining traditional energy exploration and production moratoria on federal lands would result in an alternative domestic energy future that, '...increases the cost and restricts the availability of domestic oil products and natural gas...' in all economic sectors and regions of the country."

Jewish Blogging.  SAIC’s NEMS-NARUC model results determined that maintaining traditional energy exploration and production moratoria on Federal lands would result in an alternative domestic energy future that, “…increases the cost and restricts the availability of domestic oil products and natural gas…” in all economic sectors and regions of the country.  

Lexis-Nexis.  "The previous Administration and Congress removed oil and gas moratoria on public lands over one year ago, but required actions to access the energy resources thought to exist there have not been taken," said O'Neal Hamilton, chairman of the study group and commissioner for the Public Service Commission of South Carolina. "Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country. Our public interest work is dedicated to giving decision makers information upon which they can rely in developing America's national energy policy."   ...   On Feb. 15, members of the Moratoria Study Group discussed the report at NARUC's winter committee meetings in Washington, D.C. The members went to great lengths to tout the report's fairness and balance. Hamilton emphasized that the study resulted in "a very unbiased report," while Dave Harbour, moratoria study group vice chairman and a former regulatory commissioner from Alaska, said the report was "not colored by bias."John Broderick, moratoria study group official observer and senior economist at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, said he considered the report "a very balanced work." He added: "It's not just an industry study." Bob Pickett, chairman of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and a moratoria study group participant, said that when he agreed to join the group, he initially thought "this has the potential to be controversial." But he said he ended up impressed with the study's dedication to the model used in its forecasts and with how the study considered the interests of businesses

Master Resource, by Dave Harbour.  At the NARUC Winter Meeting in Washington D.C. last week, a Study Group composed of regulatory commissioners, consultants, government and university economists, and non-profit association sponsors released their energy research report: ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF MAINTAINING OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION MORATORIA ON AND BENEATH FEDERAL LANDS (Assessment of the Combined Relative Impacts of Maintaining Moratoria and Increased Domestic Onshore and Offshore Oil and Gas Resource Estimates).

National Journal by Chuck Gray (NGP Photo).  NARUC strongly supports improved energy efficiency as the first option forachieving greater energy security, but conservation alone will not be enough to address anticipated demand. To become truly energy independent, Congress and the Obama Administration will need to keep all options on the table—efficiency, renewables, fossil fuels, natural gas, and nuclear. All of these fuels have domestic components, and all must be considered if we are going to wean ourselves from inhospitable foreign energy sources.  Over the past several years, NARUC has endorsed calls for lifting the Outer Continental Shelf moratorium in an environmentally and economically responsible fashion. 

 

Northern Gas Pipelines, by Dave Harbour.

OCS Advisory Board Presentation, Dr. Michelle Foss (NGP Photo).  Slides 11-13.

Oil and Gas Journal.  WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 25 -- US Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) urged House Natural Resources Committee leaders to schedule hearings on the economic costs of continued delays in offshore oil and gas development a week after the first major report on the subject was released. 

Oil Daily.  In a study released Monday, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) said the economic impacts of maintaining the moratoria would be significant and would drag down US economic growth over the next two decades.

Offshore Energy Law Blog (by Jacob DweckDavid L. WochnerBenjamin Norris).  A report issued by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) concludes that continuing oil and natural gas exploration and production moratoria off the U.S. East Coast would likely have significant negative effects on the U.S. economy.  The model used in the study predicts, among other things, that by 2030, U.S. crude oil production will decrease by 15% annually, oil imports from OPEC countries will increase 19%, and U.S. gross domestic product will decrease on average 0.52% each year.  A copy of the report's executive summary can be found here.

Offshore Oil Jobs.  WASHINGTON, February 15, 2007, 11a.m.- A public/private Study Group today reported to the nation’s State utility regulators in Washington that its research has identified trillions of dollars of impacts resulting from updated domestic oil and gas resource projections and decisions to maintain moratoria restrictions against development of America’s oil and gas resources.

Peak Oil News, #15.  The U.S. economy could lose trillions of dollars in income and see oil imports increase if the Obama administration maintains a moratorium on domestic petroleum development in new areas, a new report warns. The study was co-commissioned by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, or NARUC, and the oil and natural gas industry. It comes as the Department of the Interior is re-writing the administration's plans on where, when and if it will allow new exploration around the country, particularly in the Outer Continental Shelf. It also follows an email last fall from a top Interior Department official indicating that public comments ran two-to-one in favor of a Bush administration plan to expand offshore drilling.

Pennenergy.  The American Gas Association (AGA) commended the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) for administering a study that closely examines the financial, social and environmental impacts of our nation’s oil and natural gas moratoria.

Petroleum News Alaska, by Alan Baily (NGP Photo).  In 2008, faced with energy security issues and soaring oil prices, President Bush and the U.S. Congress eliminated some decades-long moratoria on oil and gas development in huge tracts of federal offshore and onshore territory. But in a continuing debate over whether oil and gas exploration should in fact be sanctioned in any of this erstwhile closed land, just what is the nature of the trade-off between the economic benefits of oil and gas production and the environmental impacts of oil and gas development?  In an attempt to attach some solid data to the development side of the trade-off balancing act, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners instituted a study....

Press Release Point: CHICAGO-A broad-based Study Group briefed the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Gas Committee today on a three-year effort to design and execute a research project to determine the social, economic and environmental effects/costs of not developing America's oil and gas resources.

Rigzone by Ian Talley.  The U.S. economy could lose trillions of dollars in income and see oil imports increase if the Obama administration maintains a moratorium on domestic petroleum development in new areas, a new report warns.

SCRIBD: The Executive Summary.

SNL.  "NARUC's Gas Committee Receives Update on 'MoratoriaStudy... 10/30/2007 NGSA joinsNARUC study assessing impact of energy exploration moratoriums ...

Solve Climate Dot Com.  According to the vice-chair of the NARUC study group, Dave Harbour, the hope is that this new analysis might play a role in the Obama administration’s decisions on whether or not to open up some restricted lands to new drilling operations. President Bush officially lifted the decades-old moratoria in 2008, but the new administration has yet to allow new projects to move forward. ... Harbour, the former regulatory commissioner of Alaska and vice-chair of the study group, says that the NARUC report is not making a judgment on amounts of oil but is simply showing that it is better to burn domestically produced oil and gas than fuels produced elsewhere.

 

“All I’m saying is that lawmakers have to consider whether or not they want to continue exporting dollar bills and jobs to bring in that barrel or they want to bring in that barrel from here,” he says. “That doesn’t mean that in general we’ll burn more oil, it just means we’ll burn more domestic oil.”

 

Supply Chain Brain: Two years of research conducted by a public/private study group and administered by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners has identified trillions of dollars in impacts that would result from maintaining certain restrictions on development of America’s oil and gas resources.

Targeted News Service.  A broad-based Study Group briefed the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Gas Committee today on a three-year effort to design and execute a research project to determine the social, economic and environmental effects/costs of not developing America's oil and gas resources.

Texas Gas Association.  AGA Commends New NARUC-Administered Study on Oil & Gas Moratoria

The Lidoil-and-gas drilling bans will raise consumer energy costs and decrease cumulative U.S. GDP by $2.36 trillion over the next two decades (full report below). That’s an average annual GDP drop of roughly.5%, it will also result in $4,400 average loss in real disposal income. The report, presented to nation’s State utility regulators in Washington has identified trillions of dollars of impact resulting from President Obama's strategy of continued reliance on foriegn oil.

Twitter-NARUC.  NARUC Gas Committee Receives Final Report Detailing Oil/Gas Moratoria Impacts www.naruc.org/?pr=183

U.S. Hour (Dow Jones).  Although Congress lifted the official 30-year moratorium for drilling on many new areas off the U.S. coast, the administration has in principle maintained the moratorium by not opening new, unscheduled
areas for development.  “Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects
that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country,” said O’Neal Hamilton, chairman of the NARUC study group that
ordered the review.

Western Business Roundtable.  A public/private Study Group reported to the nation’s State utility regulators that its research has identified trillions of dollars of impacts resulting from updated domestic oil and gas resource projections and decisions to maintain moratoria restrictions against development of America’s oil and gas resources.

  

 
 
2/5/10, 6:30 PM Wall Street Journal
 
Ian Talley
 
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The U.S. economy could lose trillions of dollars in income and see oil imports increase if the Obama administration maintains a moratorium on domestic petroleum development in closed areas, a new report warns.
 
The study was co-commissioned by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, or NARUC, and the oil and natural gas industry.
 
It comes as the Department of the Interior is re-writing the administration’s plans on where, when and if it will allow new exploration around the country, particularly in the Outer Continental Shelf.
 
It also follows an email last fall from a top Interior Department official indicating that public comments ran two-to-one in favor of a Bush administration plan to expand offshore drilling.
 
Although Congress lifted the official 30-year moratorium for drilling on many new areas off the U.S. coast, the administration has in principle maintained the moratorium by not opening new, unscheduled areas for development. The Interior Department under the Obama Administration has held several previously-scheduled lease sales and approved two Arctic exploration licenses for blocks the industry says may have great potential.
 
"Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country," said O’Neal Hamilton, chairman of the NARUC study group that ordered the review.
 
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has repeatedly said that oil and natural gas will remain critical components of the domestic energy portfolio for years. Last year, the department offered more than 56 million acres for development on and offshore as part of long-planned lease sales.
 
Interior spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff noted in an email that despite downward pressure on oil and gas prices due to global economic conditions, federal onshore and offshore oil production actually increased 14% over the last year, and federal natural gas production rose 33%.
 
"And while Secretary Salazar believes we must responsibly develop both conventional and renewable resources here at home, we must also ensure that energy development occurs in the right ways and the right places, and with a fair return to taxpayers," Barkoff said.
 
The study, based on updated oil and natural gas resource figures, said maintaining a de facto moratorium would not only cut domestic production and increase imports, but that over a 20-year period gross domestic product decreases by $2.36 trillion, an average of half-percent a year. Cumulative national real disposable increase decreases by $1.2 trillion over the period, about $4,500 per person.
 
The study will likely give added political ammunition to proponents of new exploration, particularly as the Obama administration is touting its desire to boost the economy with a jobs bill.
 
While the study was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute, the American Gas Association and a raft of oil and natural gas companies, its reviewers included administration officials in the Department of Energy, the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Land Management.
 
According to the report, the updated natural gas resource base is equal to up to 90 years of U.S. consumption, while oil resources are the equivalent of almost 50 years, based on 2009 demand. If the Administration allowed access to the closed areas, domestic crude production could rise by 10 billion barrels and natural gas production by 46 trillion cubic feet over the next 20 years.
 
Interior Secretary Salazar’s decision to review development has not only raised the ire of some in the public, but also state officials. Virginia politicians talked of legal action after one Interior official said a planned offshore lease there would likely be delayed years beyond 2011. Alaska officials warned the Department that a decision to keep new Alaska development off limits could prematurely cut crude transport to the lower 48 states because major pipes wouldn’t have the minimum operating capacity to fill it.
 
Republican lawmakers, including the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee Doc Hastings, (R., Wa.), seized on the report to criticize Democratic policies that aimed to curtail development.
 
"Unless their policies change, Americans can look forward to a world with millions of fewer jobs, higher gas prices, higher electricity prices, and billions of American dollars being sent to hostile foreign countries," Hastings said in an emailed statement.  
 
# # #
Older Moratoria Study Group references: 9-18-09 Study Group Letter to MMS

 

 (MORE NARUC MEETING PHOTOS BELOW: MORATORIA REPORT, COMMISSIONERS EMERITUS AND GENERAL PHOTOS)

NARUC, WASHINGTON D.C., FEBRUARY 2010, GAS COMMITTEE MORATORIA REPORT PHOTOS (Full resolution photos available):

Jay Ratafia-Brown, SAIC

 

 

Hannah Northey, Argus Media

 

 

 

 

John W. Broderick, Moratoria Study Group Observer, Sr. Economist, US Bureau of Land management, Minerals and Realty Management.

 

Dr. Michelle Foss, of the University of Texas Center for Energy Economics, Bureau of Economic Geology 

 

 

 

 

 David Holt, President, Consumer Energy Alliance

 

 

 

 

NARUC Gas Committee and Commissioners Emeritus Photos from the conference ..............

1.  Commissioners Emeritus Luncheon:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  Gas Committee Photos:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Study Reveals Consequences of Restrictions on Domestic Energy Exploration

15 February 2010 11:17am

 NARUC Gas Committee Receives Final Report Detailing Oil/Gas Moratoria Impacts

 
WASHINGTON— A public/private Study Group today reported to the nation’s State utility regulators in Washington that its
By Daniel Whitten
Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Restrictions on oil and gas drilling will cost the U.S. economy $2.36 trillion through 2029....
Dave Harbour, a retired commissioner of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, who helped oversee the study, said the calculation of lost GDP was based on the contribution the untapped oil and gas revenues would make ....
research has identified trillions of dollars of impacts resulting from updated domestic oil and gas resource projections and decisions to maintain moratoria restrictions against development of America’s oil and gas resources.
 
The presentation marks the end of an almost two-year study effort administered by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and a broad group of public and private interests to determine the financial and environmental impacts of maintaining the moratoria restrictions.
 
“The previous Administration and Congress removed oil and gas moratoria on public lands over one year ago,” Study Group Chairman O’Neal Hamilton (NGP Photo-l at NARUC with FERC Commissioner Phillip Moeller) said, “but required actions to access the energy resources thought to exist there have not been taken.”    Hamilton is past Chairman of the South Carolina Public Service Commission and Chairman of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’ NARUC Committee on Gas, which initiated the study in 2007.
 
“Whether additional Federal lands should be leased for energy development--and under what conditions leasing should occur--is a matter for national energy policy decision makers,” Hamilton said.  “Our research allows policy makers to know the extent of the resource base and the effects that maintaining the restrictions would have on the country. Our public interest work is dedicated to giving decision makers information upon which they can rely in developing America’s national energy policy.”
 
In July 2007, NARUC’s Gas Committee and Board of Directors adopted a resolutionauthorizing the Association’s participation in a public-private partnership to study the impact of existing moratoria against energy exploration and production on federal lands, both on-shore and within the 200 mile limit around the Country’s coasts.[1]  
 
The “Moratoria Study” used a Federal government modeling program relied upon by Congress and the Administration for analyzing the energy outlook under existing laws and projecting the impacts of new energy policy proposals.  The “NARUC-National Energy Modeling System (NARUC-NEMS)” version of the model was employed by the Study Group’s contractor, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)[2]
 
Hamilton said SAIC’s report provides a comprehensive review and update of domestic oil and natural gas resources, and using the new resource estimates, projects the relative social, economic and environmental effects on the nation of maintaining various moratoria and restrictions on domestic oil and gas exploration and production through 2030.
 
In updating the resource base, the report estimated that:
•          The domestic natural gas resource base on federal lands should be increased over previous estimates by 132 Tcf onshore and by 154 Tcf offshore - - a total estimated increase in domestic natural gas from 1748 Tcf to 2034 Tcf.  To give that number perspective, in 2009 the United States consumed 22.8 Tcf and, of that amount, imported 2.7 Tcf.
•          The domestic crude oil resource base is estimated to increase, offshore, by 37 Bbo (excluding parts of Alaska); onshore, the crude oil resource base is estimated to increase by 6 Bbo for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), with no estimated increase in the Lower-48 resource base - - a total estimated increase in domestic oil from 186 Bbo to 229 Bbo.  In 2009 the United States consumed 5.2 Bbo oil, produced 1.9 Bpo at home and imported 3.3 Bbo.
 
The report projects effects on the nation of maintaining moratoria under two scenarios: 1) determining the social, economic and environmental effects of maintaining moratoria and the updated oil and natural gas resource base estimates, and 2) determining those effects without the updated resource base.
 
SAIC’s NEMS-NARUC model results determined that maintaining traditional energy exploration and production moratoria on Federal lands would result in an alternative domestic energy future that, “…increases the cost and restricts the availability of domestic oil products and natural gas…” in all economic sectors and regions of the country. According to the study, under the “Combined Comparative Case”, which combines the estimated increase in the oil and gas resource base with maintaining moratoria from 2009-2030, model projections show that[3]:
 –        Cumulative domestic oil and natural gas production decreases by 15% and 9%, respectively.
–        Average natural gas price increases by 17% and average electricity prices increase by 5%.
–        Cumulative national real disposable income decreases by $1.163 Trillion ($4,500 per capita).
–        GDP decreases cumulatively by $2.36 Trillion ($1.16 Trillion NPV), an average annual decrease of 0.52%
–        Cumulative oil imports from OPEC countries increase by 4.1 Billion barrels.
–        Cumulative national payments to OPEC countries increase by $607 Billion ($295 Billion NPV).
–        If resources within the moratoria areas are not developed, there would be no new environmental effects within the U.S. jurisdiction attributable to development of those resources.  However, as a non-modeled item, the study observes that there could be environmental effects on domestic and international waters as a result of increased tanker transport of oil and gas imports and unknown environmental effects in countries from which the U.S. would import the resources.
 
Moratoria Study Group Participants: Chairman G. O’Neal Hamilton (Chairman of NARUC’s Gas Committee and Past Chairman, South Carolina Public Service Commission); Vice Chairman Dave Harbour (NARUC Commissioner Emeritus, Regulatory Commission of Alaska-Ret.); Commissioner Victor Carrillo (Chairman, Texas Railroad Commission, NARUC/IOGCC); NARUC Executive Director Charles Gray; Commissioner Colette D. Honorable (Arkansas Public Service Commission, NARUC); Commissioner Bob Pickett (Chairman, Regulatory Commission of Alaska, NARUC); Marshall Johnson (NARUC Commissioner Emeritus, Public Service Commission of Minnesota-Ret.); Bob Keating (NARUC Commissioner Emeritus, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities-Ret.); Don Mason, (NARUC Commissioner Emeritus, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio-Ret.); Doug Mood (NARUC Commissioner Emeritus, Montana Public Service Commission-Ret.); Commissioner Dan Seamount (Chairman, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, IOGCC); Commissioner Timothy Simon (California Public Utilities Commission, NARUC); Commissioner Stan Wise (Georgia Public Service Commission, NARUC).
Moratoria Study Group Sponsors: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners,  Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, American Chemistry Council, American Gas Association, American Public Gas Association, American Petroleum Institute, BP America Production, Consumer Energy Alliance, Dominion Resources, DTE Energy, Edison Electric Institute, El Paso Natural Gas, EnCana Corporation, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Institute for 21st Century Energy (U.S. Chamber of Commerce), Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, National Fuel Gas Co., Natural Gas Supply Association, National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, Noble Energy, Marathon Oil Company, Piedmont Natural Gas, Questar Corporation, Shell Exploration and Production Co., TECO Peoples Gas System.
Moratoria Study Group Official Observers: Michelle Michot Foss, PhD (Chief Energy Economist and Head, Center for Energy Economics, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas), John Cogburn (Economist, AGL Resources), David E. Dismukes, PhD (Center for Energy Studies, Louisiana State University), Edward O’Brien (Economist), Richard P. O’Neill (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), John Pyrdol (Department of Energy), A. Michael Schaal (Energy Information Administration), John W. Broderick (Senior Economist, Minerals and Realty Management, US Bureau of Land Management), Sam Fraser (Minerals Management Service). (Federal agency economists provided essential public service guidance and information contributing to the excellence and objectivity of the process but were deemed “non-voting observers” due to their public employment).
 
NARUC is a non-profit organization founded in 1889 whose members include the governmental agencies that are engaged in the regulation of utilities and carriers in the fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. NARUC's member agencies regulate telecommunications, energy, and water utilities. NARUC represents the interests of State public utility commissions before the three branches of the Federal government.
 
# # #
 

[2] SAIC is a Fortune 500 scientific, engineering and technology applications company that uses its deep domain knowledge to solve problems of vital importance to the nation and the world in national security, energy and the environment, critical infrastructure and health.
 
[3] Where financial impact is described, “actual” as opposed to “nominal” dollar estimates are used.
 

We join with family and friends in mourning the passing of Jim Bowles....

14 February 2010 1:38am

Jim Bowles, President, ConocoPhillips Alaska (Photo: Business Wire)Jim Mulva of ConocoPhillips said: “Jim Bowles (COP Photo-l; NGP Photo-r) has led Jim Bowles, ConocoPhillipsour Alaska organization and its some 900 employees since late 2004 and presided over a number of developments that ensured our company’s place and standing in Alaska and will serve as a legacy to his leadership as we go forward.”    *      ADN by Kyle Hopkins.  State troopers are watching the weather for a chance to return to the scene of an avalanche that killed Conoco Phillips Alaska President Jim Bowles and left another Conoco worker missing Saturday on the Kenai Peninsula.   *    KTUU.  Officials mourn Bowles' passing.   *    UPI.     *     Forbes

Monday We Will Announce Results Of A 2-year-long Study from Washington: Developing Reliable Research Regarding the Social, Economic and Environmental Effects of Maintaining Domestic Energy Exploration and Production Moratoria On and Beneath Federal Lands.

12 February 2010 12:00am

CBC News.  The lead proponent of the Mackenzie Gas Project says it should not have to provide an update on the economic feasibility of the proposed Mackenzie Valley natural gas pipeline in the Northwest Territories.  Imperial Oil, which heads the consortium of companies behind the pipeline proposal, responded on Wednesday to a request from Alternatives North to release updated data on the natural gas market and the economic feasibility of the pipeline.  Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2010/02/11/mgp-neb-imperial.html#ixzz0fI40bCuV

Calgary Herald by Dan Healing.  New Alberta Energy Minister Ron Liepert is one of the most watched politicians in the province these days as he puts the finishing touches on the competitiveness review and tries  to gets himself up to speed in a complicated new portfolio.  Still, he found time to talk to the Herald late Wednesday after the province reported its biggest February land sale in 14 years, a sale that raised a sixth of the $630 million the energy department is budgetting for in 2010-11.  ...   Word on what the province is actually going to do to try to bring Alberta's oil and gas sector back to health won't really be known until early March, the latest deadline for the oft-delayed exercise.  (Alaska leaders should be watching this.  -dh)

 

10:45 AM
Moratoria Study Group Report 
Introductions: Hon. G. O'Neal Hamilton, Moratoria Study Group Chairman
Moderator
Dave Harbour - Moratoria Study Group Vice Chairman. Commissioner Emeritus - Regulatory Commission of Alaska


Check Here Tomorrow for A Big National Energy Policy Announcement!

11 February 2010 3:51am

Alaska Dispatch by Rena Delbridge.  The state's AGIA coordinator, Mark Myers (NGP Photo-r), filled a House Finance subcommittee in on his office's work so far facilitating the state's permitting and public relations end of gasline prep.

Part of the deal under the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act was that the state would appoint a coordinator, modeled under the federal coordinator's (Larry Persily-NGP Photo-l) office established by the U.S. Congress to bring the alphabet soup of permitting and regulatory agencies onto the same page.
 
Press Trust of India.  A US Senator today urged President Barack Obama, to stay focused on the need to increase domestic energy production as the country transitions to alternative energy sources.  Mark Begich (NGP Photo-r), US Senator from Alaska, wrote a letter to the President, after Obama told a White House media briefing that America's energy future is a combination of old and new approaches including, "can we identify opportunities to increase our oil and natural gas production in a way that is environmentally sustainable? And that should be part of a package with our development of clean energy."  "I wanted to capitalise on your comments to underscore three issues vital to meeting America's energy needs: support for an Alaska natural gas pipeline project, increase offshore energy development and reasonable federal tax policy to encourage more domestic energy production," Begich wrote.
 
Calgary Herald.  Canada ranks low on shale gas index.Shale gas is proving to be a tough, and competitive nut to crack, according to a new Thompson Reuters index of shale gas producers that ranks the top 20 companies looking to exploit what many are touting as next big gas frontier.

 

Alaskans For an All Alaska Gas Pipeline have plenty of ideas for how to spend other peoples' money on pipedreams.

 

Canadians have characters, too: CBC has obtained a copy of the search warrant executed last month on Wiebo Ludwig’s farm near Hythe, Alta., in connection with the investigation into the bombing of natural gas pipeline sites in B.C.

Canadian and US reports for reference of NGP readers:

Mackenzie Valley Gas Conversion Feasibility Study
As a result of the proposed Mackenzie Valley Gas Pipeline (MGP), the Government of the. Northwest Territories (GNWT) started the process of evaluating ...
The Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Status and Current Policy
CRS-13 Canadian matters that could affect an Alaska natural gas pipeline include the Mackenzie Valley pipeline; TransCanada's certification; the Alberta ...