Steve Pratt (NGP Photo), President of Consumer Energy Alliance, provided this written comment to the members of the Citizens' Advisory Commission on Federal Areas, in response to their Federal Overreach Summit this week.
Yesterday's Federal Overreach Summit 1st Day Summary
Today we hear from Alaska's Congressional Delegation: live video streaming here by 8 a.m. Alaska Time
Yesterday was Day 1 of the Federal Overreach Summit, sponsored by the "Citizens Advisory Commission on Federal Areas." We follow this matter closely, since over the last five years we have observed and reported herein on numerous instances where federal agencies have misused the law to delay or stop energy and mining projects in Alaska.
|(For a wonderful documentary about the fight for statehood and now the threat to Alaska’s economic survival, please see the video below and this three-part video, “Alaska Under Siege”, http://www.northerngaspipelines.com/content/11-13-12-alaska-under-siege.)|
Last Friday, in preparation for this week's Federal Overreach Summit, we provided video documenting Washington's arrogant assault on the Alaska Statehood Compact and the economy of Alaska it was contracted to protect.
From early morning until late afternoon, the audience received information and examples of the federal government harming Alaskans by exercising a heavy hand of overreaching federal authority.
State Representative Wes Keller (NGP Photo) chaired and opened the meeting. He said that the Legislature had recently determined that the issue of 'Federal Overreaching Jurisdiction' was one of the highest priority issues in the state and that he is, "...pledged to supporting the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Alaska."
Keller introduced Senator John Coghill (NGP Photo), Master of Ceremonies of the two day event. Coghill complimented Alaska's Governor for "standing up for Alaska" when the federal government has misinterpreted or violated the law.
He introduced Governor Sean Parnell (NGP Photo), who, speaking via teleconference, reiterated his commitment to defending Alaska from federal overreach, while also urging Alaskans to engage in the process. “Alaskans know far too well what overreach looks like,” Parnell said. “Federal overreach occurs as the federal government overspends, overtaxes, overregulates, over-snoops and over-decides those things that ought to be left to individuals or their local or state representatives. The State of Alaska will continue to stand up on behalf of Alaskans, using every tool available to ensure our rights and freedoms are upheld.” Parnell cited recent cases such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed polar bear habitat designation, other federal misuses of the Endangered Species Act, failure to hold timely lease sales or make permitting decisions, and continued delays in building a road for the residents of King Cove--a matter of life and death to local residents.
(Here is the agenda. There were many more presenters yesterday and we will attempt to cover them all. We also hope to post a link to the entire conference by tomorrow. Our report will continue tomorrow....)
Steve Pratt (NGP Photo), President of Consumer Energy Alliance, provided this written comment to the members of the Citizens' Advisory Commission on Federal Areas, in response to their Federal Overreach Summit this week:
Federal Overreach Summit
State of Alaska
August 12-13, 2013
Consumer Energy Alliance Alaska is the Alaska chapter of a national organization of the same name. CEA brings together consumers, producers, and manufacturers to engage in a meaningful dialogue about America’s energy future. Energy development impacts everyone. In Alaska, of primary concern is declining TAPS throughput, and federal overreach policies have contributed significantly to that decline.
Federal overreach into Alaska affairs has thwarted oil production in the state, threatening Alaska’s economic destiny, TAPS viability, and national energy security. Article 8 of Alaska’s constitution explicitly requires the settlement of its lands and the development of its resources.
The United States federal government has failed to live up to provisions of the Statehood Act and promises to the people of the state to allow for resource development to ensure economic sustainability. Consumers across the land – mothers, fathers, businessmen, environmentalists, educators, scientists, and all others deserve robust, responsible resource development to advance our scientific understanding of the land, its people, and its economic and cultural purpose. Instead, much of Alaska has been declared off-limits to satisfy a narrow, greedy constituency that seeks to forbid us from using resources to benefit the lives and livelihoods of Alaskans, North Americans, and those beyond.
This greed, and failure to share Alaska’s bounty with a world hungry for resources, harms the welfare of all. Those who have achieved ever-greater success at denying access to Alaska’s mineral resources that might help alleviate grinding poverty around the globe care not about the consequences on most of humanity since they themselves lead comfortable lives. This summit should look for ways to overcome narrow self-interest to fulfill the mandates of our constitution.
Over the past two years CEA Ak has joined with the state’s bipartisan Congressional delegation, the Governor, many state elected officials and hundreds of business and social leaders of Alaska to implore the Obama Administration to avoid using administrative procedures to thwart congressional authority and responsible exploration and development in the Alaska. We testified at numerous public hearings about the cultural, social, and economic impacts of developing various regions of the state. Some hearing schedules were designed to avoid public input by scheduling evening sessions on Ash Wednesday, Valentine’s Day, the first day of Fur Rondy when families traditionally attend fireworks celebrations, and on days adjacent to summer holiday weekends. When testimony overwhelmingly expressed Alaskan’s desire for development, new hearings were scheduled to seek further input.
Development of Alaska’s Outer Continental Shelf, access to resources in the National Petroleum Reserve – Alaska, access to the 1002 area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as set aside by Congress, and moving forward with the permitting process for Bristol Bay Watershed determinations are all examples of major resource issues for the state. These deserve fair and unbiased review with respect to the impact on Alaska and the nation. The interests of the State of Alaska, its citizens, and energy consumers throughout North America have been quashed by a minority of voices seeking to use the power of the federal government to entangle rather than enable legitimate, safe resource development. In the case of Bristol Bay, attempts by the federal government to forbid a valid assessment of the resource potential on state lands even before a permit is applied for gives grave cause for concern about the ability of the nation as currently governed to adhere to its founding principles.
In his 1801 inaugural address, Thomas Jefferson defined “A wise and frugal Government” as one “which shall restrain men from injuring one another, [and] shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvements.” Jefferson envisioned “A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with rich production of their industry, engaged in commerce with nations who feel power and forget right, advancing rapidly to destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye.”
Our own federal government, with respect to its own citizens, has now become what Jefferson loathed: “a nation that feels power and forgets right.” It is right that Alaska fulfill its destiny to use its resources for the maximum benefit of its people. It is our birthright as a state. Alaskans know better than anyone else how best to regulate our own pursuits of industry and improvements, and the federal government needs to step aside and allow this to happen. The Statehood Compact has become nothing more than hollow, high sounding words, devoid of any true sanctity of contract.
The outcome of the Summit will hopefully bring us back to a place that gave rise to statehood in the first place – primacy of state control over resources, especially on state lands, and the promise of development and revenue sharing on federal lands. The federal government needs to follow rather than usurp the directives of Congress. Federal government overreach has found a life of its own, uncontrolled by checks and balances.
Energy consumers deserve responsible access to the resources that can unchain their lives. The state should engage in all avenues to make that happen.
Very truly yours,
Consumer Energy Alliance Alaska
 One commenter from the Wilderness Society opined that increasing amounts of wilderness designation should be favored because that would allow her to experience vast tracks of land where she knows no other humans have trekked. Since she has the resources to make such treks, she thought that society should honor her desire to set aside vast expanses of land for her personal recreational pursuits, irrespective of how many other lives this would adversely affect. She thought the NPR-A would best be a national park rather than treasure trove to benefit humanity.
...for our Alaska readers and friends of the State
We believe that the event on Monday and Tuesday will foretell the future of Alaska.
The Commentary below says why. We urge all faithful Alaskans to take leave from their jobs and vacations to participate. The commitment of our NGP readers alone could protect Alaska from the relentless overreach of our federal government and preserve the Statehood compact for future generations.
Representative Charisse Millett (NGP Photo) is one of a hand full of Alaska Legislators who -- like Governor Sean Parnell -- defends Alaska against federal overreach at every opportunity. Most recently, Governor Parnell offered to assist the Federal government in assessing the oil and gas potential of the small sliver of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) that Congress designated for oil and gas exploration and production.
The Obama Administration declined the offer, still intent in blocking Congressional intent that the small sliver (i.e. called the 1002 area) be explored. Millet wrote a follow-up letter to the new Secretary of the Interior, urging reconsideration. Out of respect for Representative Millett's initiative and with hope that more and more Legislators will become engaged in defending Alaska against an overreaching federal government, we reprint that letter below.
Next Monday and Tuesday, July 12 and 13, 2013, Alaska will have convened a Federal Overreach Summit. The purpose of this commentary is to help our Alaskan readers arm themselves with background over the weekend.
* * *
While America's creation rested on patriots who seceded from their colonial landlord; Alaska's statehood was conceived and executed by colonists who wished to join and become a full and equal state of their national landlord.
In both cases, their noble accomplishments required a series of actions planned and executed by patriots.
In Alaska's case, that key series of actions is often referred to as culminating in the 'Statehood Compact'. (For a wonderful documentary about the fight for statehood and now the threat to Alaska’s economic survival, please see the video below and this three-part video, “Alaska Under Siege”, http://www.northerngaspipelines.com/content/11-13-12-alaska-under-siege.)
While more of a student of history than a historian, I find the struggle for statehood inspiring and the responsibility for protecting it, sobering. Our 1959-era forebears achieved statehood after over a dozen attempts over the course of 50 years.
Statehood opponents successfully lobbied Congress and presidents against Alaska statehood, clear up to its approval in 1959. Those opponents had one argument. “Alaskans don’t have the means to make a living in that Arctic state.”
In 1955, Alaskans convened a ‘Constitutional Convention’, creating what many believed to be a “model constitution” under the leadership of Bill Egan (Note: Years later when I was writing a speech for him, the Governor said, “Beware of the vulturistic federal government”.)
Then Richfield Oil Company’s (i.e. now, ConocoPhillips’) Bill Bishop, discovered the Swanson River Oil Field in 1957. Armed with oil, timber, fishing and mining potential, Alaska statehood advocates now had a stronger argument.
In 1958 a new statehood bill gave Alaska about 104 million acres of the Territory along with mineral rights. Alaska was to receive more land than any other state -- in addition to 90% of mineral revenues from federal land – to assure its government and people could make a living. Congress passed it. Alaskan voters supported the Statehood bill as they had their model constitution and the president signed the Alaska Statehood Proclamation on January 3, 1959. That array of actions by the Federal Government, the Territorial Government and Alaska’s Voters to adopt a Constitution and an Alaska Statehood Act -- complete with Federal promises to Alaskans -- is what most of us refer to as the Alaska Statehood Compact (Note: some lawyers argue that only parts of the Statehood Act itself could be called a "compact" between the federal government and the people of the state.)
A delegate to the constitutional convention, former Lt. Governor Jack Coghill, later said that the statehood bill was more than a bill; it was a ‘contract’.
One of Alaska’s greatest statehood advocates was future governor Walter J. Hickel (NGP Photo). When asked by Congressmen how much of the territory should be deeded over to the new state, to make it viable, Hickel remembered blurting out, “100 million acres” without knowing the exact size of the 360 million acre territory.
Anchorage Times publisher, Robert Atwood, was another volunteer statehood lobbyist. He recalled Secretary of Interior Fred Seaton’s efforts to make sure Alaskans knew the state would receive 90% of the revenue flowing from natural resources produced from Federal lands. On that basis, among others, voters supported statehood. Some, since then, have argued that the 90/10 ratio is a political formula rather than part of a compact and subject to change by the federal government.
My own observation is that over the years a variety of federal initiatives have worked to neutralize the Federal obligation. Federal actions have denied Alaskans reasonable access to the energy and other natural resources they were promised on federal and state lands. In retrospect, the Statehood Bill language might have been more artfully stated, but Alaskans at the time knew what the deal was and voted in good faith for it. To them, the Statehood Bill -- not parts of it and their ratification of it -- was a permanent compact.
We now have clear evidence that the Federal government has treated Alaska like a colony, abusing its citizens at will, even compromising the rule of law as it has violated terms of the government-people compact.
In www.northerngaspipelines.com, we have written extensively on the subject of “federal obstruction”, our term for "overreach". Here are a number of examples we and others have chronicled over the past few years:
- April 2009. Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar visited Anchorage and other cities to conduct hearings on the Minerals Management Service (MMS, now BOEM) five-year Oil & Gas leasing programs. The 2007-12 and 2012-17 programs presented no new opportunities for exploration, only orders from the Secretary to cancel programs, conduct more studies and deny access by rejecting permit applications.
- August 2009. A White House Ocean Policy created by President Obama via Executive Order – without Congressional authority or funding -- would have the effect of “zoning the oceans and Great Lakes” and would even give bureaucrats authority to restrict human behavior in areas of the country touched by rivers and streams leading into the oceans and Great Lakes. Since about ¾ of America’s coastline surrounds Alaska -- and since Alaska has about 3 million lakes, rivers and streams -- one could envision the last vestiges of free enterprise in the Last Frontier being snuffed out by bureaucratic manipulation of new ocean policy restrictions.
- September 2009. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) visited Alaska to hear testimony on whether it should grant a Clean Air Act permit to Shell Oil. EPA’s reluctance to approve Shell’s reasonable applications for permits to explore the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas on leases it purchased from the federal government in good faith resulted in continuous, unjustified rejections and delays in Shell’s exploration programs.
- March 2010. Governor Sean Parnell urged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw its denial of ConocoPhillips Alaska’s reasonable permit application to construct facilities on its CD-5 Alpine Satellite Development within the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. After long delays, the Corps finally issued the permit.
- July 2010. The Parnell Administration vowed to fight “…Improper listings and critical habitat designations with sound science and cost data,” referring to efforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to designate 187,166 square miles as a critical habitat for polar bears when the population of the bears is not declining. It is a Federal overreach that Alaska and the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation believe will cost Alaskans hundreds of millions of dollars in economic potential.
- September 2010. The State of Alaska sued the Secretary of the Interior in U.S. District Court to overturn the federal moratorium on offshore drilling in Alaska’s OCS, on grounds that the Obama administration violated federal law and acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner.
- September 2010. Alaska challenged National Park Service regulations, claiming they violate federal law, usurp state sovereignty, and infringe the liberty of Alaskans.
- September 2010. Alaska objected to USFWS steps to seek wilderness designations for the 1002 area within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s 19 million acres that would prevent development of up to 16 billion barrels of oil.
- Killing Alaska's Timber Jobs and Forestry Businesses. Although the Chugach and Tongass were established as working forests with multiple use mandates, today both are being managed like national parks, despite an annual sustainable harvest level of 520 million board feet set for the Tongass under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). Over the past 20 years the forest industry has suffered repeated blows – many of them at the hands of the federal government. Federal policy changes were described in the 2012 Timber Jobs Task Force report to Governor Parnell. The Task Force found that “Federal policies and management practices fail to provide sufficient timber supply for Southeast Alaska’s timber industry” and that “Environmental groups have exerted undue influence over USFS policy and direction related to national forest management in Alaska.” Federal policy, including the Obama administration’s reluctance to honor a settlement agreement to exempt the Tongass from the Roadless Rule, is killing an industry that only several decades ago was a cornerstone of the Southeast Alaska economy. In 1990, 473 million board feet of timber was harvested from the Tongass National Forest, but today the annual cut has fallen to only 21 million board feet. In 1990, there were more than 4,000 jobs in the forest industry and its support sector, today there are less than 1,000. Meanwhile, approximately 94 percent of the Tongass remains closed to timber harvesting and no commercial harvests are taking place in the Chugach National Forest, the nation’s second largest.
- Last year, the Federal government's Bureau of Land Management closed half of the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska to oil and gas exploration and development while it has hypocritically refused for years to clean up federal drilling debris and hazardous waste that it created in the petroleum reserve (NPR-A Photo: 'Knifeblade' Pad). The US Fish and Wildlife Service has acted to more permanently recommend restricted access to the small sliver of land designated by Congress for oil and gas activity within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The EPA has unreasonably and many think, illegally, used authority of the Clean Water Act to determine whether it should stop a mining project on Alaska state lands before that project has even filed a permit application or plan of development.
Next Monday and Tuesday, a distinguished group of Alaskan Commissioners will gather to evaluate the issue of federal overreaching jurisdiction and identify possible solutions--along with the state's citizens (Reserve space here).
The reason why this event is so important is that it will impact the future of every Alaskan.
The Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) once provided America with about 20% of its total domestic oil supply. Alaska was the Nation's #1 oil producing state and contributed mightily to the national defense, to our balance of payments strength, to reasonable energy prices. In addition, the pipeline produced the lion's share of Alaska's state operating budget, now 90%. Over half of Alaska's economy depends on TAPS throughput!
Today, Alaska production falls behind that of North Dakota, Texas and even California. TAPS throughput finds itself transporting only 1/4 its capacity and the amount of oil moving through Alaska's economic umbilical cord is decreasing at a rate of 5-7% per year.
Yet, Alaska's budget continues to grow. We have an unfunded state employee pension liability bigger than Detroit's.
In short, Alaska is deep in debt, its annual revenue is decreasing and its annual costs continue to increase.
There are three ways to correct a dangerous and unsustainable future. We have to undertake some combination of increasing revenue and decreasing costs.
Both of these difficult challenges are in the laps of our elected leaders. Decreasing costs and increasing oil and mineral production revenue from state lands are state issues.
But filling TAPS with new oil also depends on state leadership to change the federal government's policy against stonewalling natural resource projects in Alaska that could make a difference.
The federal government could work with Alaska to more reasonably develop: 1) the ANILCA 1002 area of ANWR, 2) NPR-A, and 3) OCS oil and gas resources. All three of these huge, potential oil and gas areas could infuse TAPS with a new stream of economic health for Alaska and contribute to the viability of a natural gas pipeline project.
If the federal government persists in blocking these and other initiatives, it will contribute to pinching off the economic lifeblood of Alaska while, at the same time, violating the intent if not the actual language of the Alaska Statehood Bill and the Compact with the people of Alaska.
Alaska could once again become a ward of the federal government. Should that happen, history will record the stark difference between the courage, creativity, leadership and determination of the 1959 generation of Alaskans and the 2013 generation.
Yes, Monday and Tuesday will be historic days for Alaska. The will to win or the desire for complacency will struggle those days. Some faithful Alaskans will respond to the call for sacrifice and battle to preserve the Compact. Some will, like 'Royalists' during the Revolutionary War, support the king, and his effort to emasculate the great state of Alaska.
See you there....
1) the 25 minute summary of the Alaska Statehood Compact below (scroll down) and how the federal government has broken its promises to the people of Alaska.
2) This more recent, documentary trilogy of how the federal government continues to abuse power and threaten the future of Alaska.
Any reader who absorbs this hours' worth of history and the associated facts is sure to be armed with objective reasons why Alaskans must make a last ditch stand right now. Time is of the essence, to preserve the sovereignty of the state and enforce the statehood agreement which the Congress, the President and the People of Alaska memorialized via the Statehood Compact over 50 years ago.
If action is not taken now -- by this generation -- the speed at which the federal government is eroding the economy of the state will soon overpower its ability to recover. Like Gulliver, Alaska will find itself covered with Lilliputians who have bound its great potential to the ground until it is incapable of rising again, let along moving a single muscle.
Rise up, Alaskans! Act while you can! Sustain the sacrifices of your forebears who achieved statehood and the rights we are now losing. Be the generation that had the courage to combat -- not the compliant colonists who willingly accepted -- colonial rule.
This afternoon, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski released a white paper outlining the case for exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Wespac Energy is presenting an LNG session this week (Invitees Only) in Anchorage: "LNG For Rural Alaska".
* * *
Lawmakers Gather In Anchorage To Consider Gas Options
Yesterday a hundred lawmakers and staff members held the first of a five day "2013 Gas Symposium" in Anchorage to better understand worldwide market conditions affecting natural gas and its first cousin, LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas).
Convened by Legislative Budget and Audit Chairwoman Anna Fairclough (NGP Photo with legislative consultants Nikos Tsafos-L and Stephen Beck), the Monday agenda consisted of a general overview, "covering all topics at the summary level", presented by Tsafos. Assisting Fairclough all week with the presentations and associated "break out" sessions, the consultants are experts employed by PFC Energy. Tsafos is the firm's Senior Manager, Global Gas, from PFC's Washington office while Beck, Senior Manager of Financial Services, flew in from the Houston office.
Legislators from throughout the state appeared, including the first few whom we noted: Senators Mike Dunleavy (NGP Photo-above-R) and Bert Stedman and Representatives Shelley Hughes (NGP Photo-L), Lindsey Holmes (NGP Photo), Andy Josephson, Scott Kawasaki, Lance Pruitt and Dan Saddler. The federal government's Alaska Gas Pipeline Coordinator, Larry Persily also attended along with a large number of citizens.
Calgary Herald by Chris Nelson. Canada needs to gets its act together if it wishes to be an energy superpower in the decades to come.
(Note: we applaud the notion that Canada must get its "act together" to face the global competitive market, complete with its global warming and pipeline ROW issues.
Likewise, we compliment the Alaska Legislature for coming to grips with global energy competition, reflected in its earlier passage this year of oil tax reform legislation and this week's effort to better understand market conditions.
Yesterday's overview included briefings on: global gas concepts, gas markets and macro fundamentals; shale gas impact on markets; possible Alaska LNG markets; gas strategies and portfolios of key companies; costs, economics, commercial structures, shipping and practices of pipeline and LNG projects.
For our readers in a position to attend the Symposium today, the Plenary Session begins at 9 a.m. (AST) and will investigate Global Gas Markets and Macro Fundamentals with a breakout session to follow. The 1:15 p.m. session will consider shale gas impact on markets with its own breakout session afterward.
The public may attend, but not participate. The Symposium is intended to update lawmakers and their staff members on gas concepts and current market conditions while the breakout sessions will likely explore Alaska's natural gas options, more specifically. The public may also be admitted to observe the discourse occurring during breakout sessions.
LNG for Rural Alaska
August 7, 2013
10 AM to 4 PM
Meeting in Endeavor Room
Captain Cook Hotel
- Introduction (10 AM – Start time)
- Workshop Objectives
- Purpose of Workshop
- Advantages of LNG as alternative fuel
- Key considerations
- Overview of WesPac and affiliates
- Corporate overview
- WesPac small/midscale LNG focus
- WesPac in Alaska
- WesPac’s Alaska LNG Initiative
- Efforts to Date
- Next Steps
- LNG Overview
- Sources of LNG
- Use of LNG
- LNG vs Diesel
- WesPac’s LNG Opportunity
- LNG Supply Availability
- Price Mechanism
- Regulatory overview
- Key Logistics
- Truck, rail and marine
- Bulk vs intermodal
- Key interfaces
- Case Studies – Examples
Lunch (12 noon – 1 PM)
- Basics of Conversion and Repowering
- Intro to ARB
- Electric conversion basics
- Diesel fuel vs LNG (decision tree)
- Case Studies – Examples
- Basics of Regasification, Storage, Distribution
- Intro to Primoris
- Regasification and storage basics
- Diesel vs LNG (decision tree)
- Case Studies – Examples
Coffee Break (2:30 PM – 2:45 PM)
- State participation
- State – AIDEA and AEA
- State Benefits
- WesPac – The Offer
- Turn Key solution
- Next Steps and Wrap up (4 PM – Close Meeting)
- Q and A
1:00-5:00pm: Opening Plenary Session (Overview, covering all topics at summary level)- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
9:00-10:15am: Plenary Session, Global gas markets and macro fundamentals- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
10:30am-12:00pm: Breakout Session-Tubughnenq’ Rooms , 2nd Floor
12:00-1:15pm: lunch offsite
1:15-2:15pm: Plenary Session, Impact of shale gas- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
2:30-4:30pm: Break out Session- Tubughnenq’ Rooms, 2nd Floor
9:00-10:15am: Plenary Session, Examination of potential markets for Alaskan LNG- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
10:30am-12:00pm: Breakout Session-Tubughnenq’ Rooms , 2nd Floor
12:00-1:15pm: lunch offsite
1:15-2:15pm: Plenary Session, Gas strategies and portfolios of key companies- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
2:30-4:30pm: Break out Session- Tubughnenq’ Rooms, 2nd Floor
9:00-10:15am: Plenary Session, Indicative costs and economics for pipeline & LNG projects- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
10:30am-12:00pm: Breakout Session-Tubughnenq’ Rooms , 2nd Floor
12:00-1:15pm: lunch offsite
1:15-2:15pm: Plenary Session, LNG and pipeline commercial structures and practices- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
2:30-4:30pm: Break out Session- Tubughnenq’ Rooms, 2nd Floor
9:00-10:15am: Plenary Session, LNG shipping- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
10:30am-12:00pm: Breakout Session- Tubughnenq’ Room, 2nd Floor
12:00-1:15pm: lunch offsite
1:15-5:00pm: Concluding Plenary Session- Kahtnu Room, 2nd Floor
Calgary Herald by Graham Thomson. ...a new pipeline to pump Alberta bitumen to the West Coast for shipment to Asia is just a matter of time. At least that’s the impression you get reading between the lines in comments made by Alberta Premier Alison Redford and British Columbia Premier Christy Clark Friday afternoon.
Alaska and Saudi Arabia Face Similar Challenges Under Vastly Different Conditions
Our readers know that 90% of Alaska's operating budget flows from the Alaska North Slope (ANS) through the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) which, in turn, is about 3/4 empty.
Oil and Gas Daily reports that in letters published Sunday on his Twitter account, Saudi Arabia's prince Alwaleed bin Talal, warned that it was alarming that "92 percent of the government budget relies on oil". He went on to discuss competition in the world and the need for diversification. Sounds familiar.
|Fairbanks News Miner Editorial. The rejection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of a plan to conduct research about oil and gas potential in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge was expected, but the Parnell administration is appealing the move.|
In Alaska's case, we have potential to fill TAPS with waiting reserves on the ANS--on state and federal lands. The majority of the state Legislature has acted to increase investment on state lands by enacting oil tax reform, though some citizens and a minority of legislators are seeking to repeal that reform through referendum.
On massive, potential reserves lying under federal lands on the ANS and off-shore, the federal government has acted on behalf of the extreme environmental agenda -- and lobbyists supporting that agenda -- in such a way as to delay, block or forever close off access to that potential.
But while Alaska and Saudi Arabia face similar oil dependency challenges, their political and natural resource conditions differ as extremely as do their climates.
The Saudi Kingdom is a monarchy capable of enshrining most policies by edict.
Alaska and America are democracies with decision makers put into place by the electorate; and, any edict-like executive orders or statutes or rules are created by officials whom the people freely elect.
The Saudis' main if not sole, significant economic asset is oil and its hope is to diversify by putting its wealth into income producing activity elsewhere in the world and in local manufacturing, among other alternatives.
Alaska is blessed with many natural resources and had access to most of them at the time of Statehood in 1959. Over the years, more restrictive and confiscatory state and federal policies have killed the timber industry, are threatening the mining industry and have severely limited the enormous potential of the oil and gas industry.
So, Saudi Arabia's principle challenge is the dependence on one major resource that is under competitive siege.
Here are two chances to become involved--easily, with minimum effort.
1. Federal. Attend an August 12-13, state organized, “Federal Overreach Summit”.
2. State. Also, speak against the effort to repeal Alaska's oil tax reform: those who support repeal of this investment climate legislation would have short term gain over long term sustainability!
Alaska's principle challenges are self inflicted.
Its 1959 statehood promise foreshadowed unparalleled opportunity, based on laws of the day.
Thanks to state and federal government tax, statutory and regulatory policy since 1959, Alaska is a only a shadow of the state it could have been.
With 90% state operating budget dependence on oil production which is a quarter of what it once was, and with governmental handcuffs on future potential, America and its largest state will have no one to blame for Alaska's coming economic insolvency but the people themselves.
Citizens can make more of a big difference in Alaska than in Saudi Arabia. We can act to support improvement of Alaska's oil tax reform policy. We can fight the federal government's continuing encroachment on Alaska's sovereignty and we can encourage more moderate state and municipal spending in order to keep in line with our declining ANS production. There is hope for a bright future for our Alaska families, if we work for it!
But if we don't improve state and federal behavior, we won't have a king to blame for disastrous policy. We won't have lack of resources to blame. We won't even have a bad president, governor, legislature or congress to blame.
We will have ourselves to blame for voting certain very poor decision makers into office over the last 54 years--or, for not voting at all.
Calgary Herald, by James Wood. The Alberta government says it isn’t rattled by U.S. President Barack Obama’s skepticism over the benefits of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, despite the high stakes riding on approval of the energy project.
Comment: We applaud Minister Dallas for bringing the truth squad to the rescue.
We are embarrassed that America's president would use his bully pulpit to bully the facts, mislead the public and use such dishonesty as a basis for delaying approval of this -- and other important -- energy projects. -dh
In a weekend interview with the New York Times, Obama scoffed at the notion of the controversial pipeline as a large generator of employment, suggesting it would create only 2,000 jobs during construction.
But Cal Dallas, Alberta’s Minister of International and Intergovernmental Relations, said Monday the president was focused on a narrow definition of job creation, noting the State Department’s own draft report on Keystone said the project would support 42,100 direct, indirect and induced jobs annually in the U.S over a two-year period.
From our friend Paul Ziff (NGP Photo):
For some time we at Ziff Energy have been seeking a partner with the resources and global footprint to help us expand our offerings and better serve our worldwide customer base. Today I am pleased to tell you we have found just such a partner.
Ziff Energy Group is now part of Solomon Associates, the leading performance improvement company for the global energy industry. Reflecting this merger, our new name will be Ziff Energy, a Division of Solomon Associates. Solomon, based in Dallas with offices worldwide, focuses on helping energy companies identify and close gaps in operational performance. Like Ziff Energy, it is led by a team of consultants with significant hands-on operational experience.
Solomon’s midstream and downstream benchmarking and consulting services are a perfect complement to our experience in upstream benchmarking. Our merger gives the energy industry a benchmarking services provider that can cover everything from the wellhead to specialty chemicals. Solomon has a number of foreign offices, which will facilitate the further expansion of our Upstream operations benchmarking.
Planning for this transition began last year as we marked our 30th anniversary as a company. Our Executive Team saw opportunities to better serve our marketplace and agreed that to take full advantage of them we needed to become part of a larger, synergistic organization. That led us to Solomon, and we anticipate broader opportunities for our staff.
We look forward to this new chapter in the life of our company, and to providing a more comprehensive suite of benchmarking and consulting services to our customers around the world. We are grateful for your continued loyalty and trust in Ziff Energy. As always, we are here to serve you.
Please note our contact information has not changed; all phone numbers and email addresses will stay the same.
View the press release: http://www.ziffenergy.com/go/link.aspx?id=216
Paul H. Ziff
Executive Vice President
Ziff Energy - A Division of Solomon Associates
Measure. Manage. Maximize.®
Witnesses Highlight States’ Successes in Regulating Fracking
Tell Federal Government to Stay Out of the Process.
Alaska Officials, Giessel and Foerster Play Lead Roles
Meanwhile, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee spokesman, Robert Dillon, responds that, "Sen. Lisa Murkowski believes that regulation of hydraulic fracturing should be done at the state level. There is no need for a federal backstop on this issue." -dh
(We'll have more to say about LNG exports on Monday)
Yesterday, Legislators representing the Energy Producing States Coalition -- including Alaska Senator Cathy Giessel (NGP Photo) -- sent this letter to Members of Congress recommending passage of an amendment to the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.).
We believe the amendment contained in HR 2728 is consistent from long-held positions adopted by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
It is referred to as, ‘Protecting States’ Rights to Promote American Energy Security Act’. The bill deals with hydraulic fracturing which Alaska companies -- and those operating throughout the United States -- have employed for many years.
In part, the bill proposes that, "The Department of the Interior shall not enforce any Federal regulation, guidance, or permit requirement regarding hydraulic fracturing, or any component of that process, relating to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities on or under any land in any State that has regulations, guidance, or permit requirements for that activity." -dh
Yesterday, the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held a legislative hearing on H.R. 2728, the Protecting States’ Rights to Promote American Energy Security Act. This bipartisan legislation, introduced by Representative Bill Flores (TX-17), would protect state rights, American jobs and American energy production by limiting the Obama Administration’s ability to impose duplicative federal regulations on hydraulic fracturing on federal lands.
Earlier this year, the Obama Administration proposed new federal hydraulic fracturing regulations. These new rules would add costly, duplicative, and unnecessary layers of red tape that will only stand in the way of developing America’s natural energy resources to create jobs, lower energy prices, and strengthen our energy security.
“The last thing the United States needs right now is duplicative regulation of an already stringently regulated process, unless, of course, we need increased federal spending and bureaucracy; delays in providing jobs, revenue, and affordable domestic energy; confusion among operators and regulators; and one-size-fits-all regulations that are ignorant to regional differences… As for Alaska in particular, approximately 25 % of Alaska’s wells have been hydraulically fractured and we have been performing hydraulic fractures for about forty years. Moreover in its history of oil and gas operations, Alaska has yet to suffer a single documented instance of subsurface damage to an underground source of drinking water. As long as each well is properly constructed and its mechanical integrity is maintained, (in other words as long as operators follow our regulations) hydraulic fracturing should have no potential to damage any fresh groundwater.” – Cathy P. Foerster, Chair and Engineering Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (NGP Photo)
|Fuel Fix: Controlling Our Own Destiny on Gas Prices Op-Ed by David Holt. The price at the pump has had more swings than a schoolyard playground of the past couple of months, and consumers can expect more. Yet America is on track to take more long-term control over its destiny with fuel prices, as we continue to realize the benefits of increased domestic oil and natural gas production.|
“In Congress, we frequently address the powers of the states versus federalism on a myriad of issues from health care, to labor, to education. H.R. 2728, the ‘Protecting States’ Rights to Promote American Energy Security Act’ takes an important step towards recognizing the important role states play in balancing energy production and effective regulations. These are important components to provide a path forward for the House Republicans’ goal of American Energy Security by the year 2020. The bill before us at today’s hearing is not a question of regulating or not regulating hydraulic fracturing. The bill before us today is about empowering local self-government and placing a check on the growth of out-of-control, one-size-fits-all-government,” said Rep Bill Flores.
“The Administration continues to pursue implementation of its own needless one size fits all federal regulations, with practically no acknowledgement of the work the States have been doing for years in managing energy production while taking into consideration their own unique geography, hydrology, and production issues. This big government one size fits all generic approach to energy regulation will not work, yet this Administration continues to approach energy regulation like all 50 states are exactly the same,” said Subcommittee Chairman Doug Lamborn. “The ‘Protecting States’ Rights to Promote American Energy Security Act’ will require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to defer to existing State regulations and prohibit the Department from enforcing needless and duplicative federal regulations in states that have existing regulations in place.”
Witnesses testifying before the Subcommittee spoke from their firsthand experience with state regulation of hydraulic fracturing. They stressed how states are already effectively and safely regulating this process, and how federal regulations would be duplicative and burdensome:
“The Commission has in place a successful and comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure that all oil and gas activities, including fracking, do not impact groundwater or surface water…Commission records do not indicate a single documented water contamination case associated with the process of fracking in Texas, and this is due to consistent and thoughtful regulation from within our state by regulators who know Texas best…Unnecessary, cumbersome federal oversight will slow Texas’ current efficient processes. While the oil and gas industry is one of the top economic drivers in Texas, we know that efficient, consistent and predictable regulation within the energy industry is the key to our state’s economic success, and the success of domestic U.S. energy production.” – Christi Craddick, Commissioner of the Texas Railroad Commission
“The Division has always had very stringent rules concerning well bore construction and the protection of water resources. However, to make the process of hydraulic fracturing more transparent and alleviate the recent public fear of hydraulic fracturing, the Division adopted a formal hydraulic fracturing rule in October 2012… I believe that Utah DOGM does an excellent job in monitoring hydraulic fracturing in Utah. Also, it is my experience that other States also perform at a similar exceptional level.” – John C. Rogers, Utah’s Associate Director of the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining
Consumer Energy Alliance Clips- July 25, 2013
Businessweek: Biofuel Makers Seek to Ease Mandates to Avert Congressional Cuts - Makers of some renewable fuels are asking the federal government to ease quotas for use of their products in a bid to head off a congressional overhaul of a program that refiners say is driving up costs at the pump.
Platts: Seeing the AAA’s view on ethanol from both sides - It must be great to be the AAA. Everybody in the US ethanol business wants you to like them. That’s why a war of words erupted over the past few days as to whether the AAA, the country’s leading group representing motorists, likes ethanol or hates it. The idea that the AAA is not a fan of at least one usage of ethanol is an easy conclusion to reach, given that the organization late last year made it quite clear that it had issues with E15, gasoline with a 15% ethanol blend.