Miss a day
Miss a lot


      This is your public service 1-stop-shop for Alaskan and Canadian Arctic energy commentary, news, history, projects and people. We update it daily for you. It is the most timely and complete northern energy archive anywhere — used by media, academia, government and industry officials throughout the world. Northern Gas Pipelines may be the oldest Alaska blog; we invite readers to name others existing before 2001.  -dh


12-11-15 "Great to have a government partner!"

11 December 2015 7:16am

Bill Walker, Alaska Governor, gas pipeline, lng, alignment of interests, Photo by Dave Harbour, Exxon, BP, ConocoPhillips, Ak-LNG

Alaska Journal of Commerce, by Tim Bradner.  Alaska Gov. Bill Walker (NGP Photo) said he gave the OK Dec. 3 for the state to vote “yes” on continuing work on the Alaska LNG Project after receiving commitments from two North Slope producing companies that they would not withdraw from the project without negotiating to sell their gas.

That same day the partners in the project, BP, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and the state, voted to approve a $230 million 2016 budget and work plan to complete preliminary engineering work. The state’s share of that is 25 percent, or about $57 million.

Be sure to read this excellent Opinion piece from today's Alaska Headlamp!

Our Comment (See Right Column): As to government ownership in a private energy project, we would only opine, "Isn't it great to have a 25% equity government partner that can use its veto power to either approve or disapprove a project's budget based on whether or not the three private partners make extraordinary commitments to the government partner?"  

To our many friends so currently mesmerized by the concept of government involvement bringing "alignment" to an energy project via equity participation, we continue to mutter an unappreciated caution, "Beware of what you wish for."  

See more here, in yesterday's comment regarding the risk one assumes when one settles into bed with a government, gas pipeline partner.  -dh

Larry Persily, AK-LNG, Kenai Borough, Photo by Dave Harbour, Federal Coordinator, Alaska Gas Pipeline, Alaska LNGLarry Persily's (NGP Photo) relevant energy links:

Unsold LNG will hang over market to mid-2020s, analyst says
(Sydney Morning Herald; Dec. 7) – Though the oil market is in dire straits, the liquefied natural gas market is worse, experts say. Hanging over the market for the next several years are large volumes of U.S. LNG exports in search of end consumers. Consultancy Facts Global Energy says 25 million to 35 million metric tons of the 65 million tons a year of U.S. LNG export capacity under construction has been sold to middlemen, traders or portfolio players such as BG or Mitsubishi, which still need to sell the gas.
"Portfolio sellers and traders are not end users, they must find buyers," FGE founder Fereidun Fesharaki said. In addition, about one-third of Qatar's LNG export capacity is unsold, while the three big Chinese national oil companies and one Indian national oil company have switched from buying to selling as they seek to resell LNG they have committed to buying but no longer need, according to FGE.
That means about 70 million tons a year of LNG still needs a buyer, weighing on the oversupplied Asian market to the mid-2020s, the consultancy said. Fesharaki describes those holding the contracts as "desperate sellers" that will provide stiff competition for producers seeking customers for new LNG projects. Fesharaki names only three new projects that could move forward in the next few years: Anadarko's Mozambique venture; expansion in Papua New Guinea; and Petronas' project in Prince Rupert, B.C.
Lack of new projects in 2020s could drive LNG prices higher
(Forbes columnist; Dec. 5) – At first blush it’s easy to skim the news of Indian LNG buyer Petronet negotiating a lower price for deliveries from Qatar’s RasGas and miss its significance. But the news is profound and typifies the radical shift that LNG markets are going through after the period of limited supply and exorbitantly high prices (2011-2014) post the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster and subsequent shutdown of all of Japan’s nuclear reactors and that country’s over-reliance on LNG.
During that period, the world’s largest LNG importers, particularly Japanese and South Korean utilities, were at the mercy of LNG producers. Spot prices for the fuel breached the $20 per million Btu mark in early 2014, while producers also locked in handsome long-term contact prices based on crude oil prices. The pendulum has now swung the other way and LNG producers are now at the mercy of buyers, hence the significance of the Petronet-RasGas contract negotiations.
However, buyers should not get too greedy in all of this, because after 2020 the pendulum will likely start to shift again in favor of producers. As natural gas prices bottom out, likely in 2016 and a few years after that, even plummeting to around $4, investment in new LNG projects will cease, which will halt new production. With new production tapering and demand increasing over the long term, markets will do what they do best, which is swing yet again in the other direction.
Anadarko says it will make Mozambique LNG decision in 2016
(Financial Times; London; Dec. 7) – Anadarko is planning to make a final decision next year on how it will develop vast gas discoveries the company has found off the east coast of Mozambique. There have been concerns that the collapse in oil prices could cause big delays in the commercialization of Mozambique’s liquefied natural gas projects, but Al Walker, Anadarko’s chief executive, said the company was on track to start producing LNG by late 2020.
Pressing ahead with Anadarko’s gas development in the Rovuma Basin in the Indian Ocean hinges on the company taking a final investment decision, which had been expected this year. That decision is now due for the second half of 2016, Walker said, following important agreements with the Mozambique government governing gas for local demand and a joint development agreement with Eni, the Italian oil company that has also made large gas discoveries in the Rovuma Basin.
Anadarko has discovered more than 75 trillion cubic feet of gas in the basin, while Eni has found about 85 tcf. Mozambique would be Anadarko’s first foray into LNG. The first phase of the project — expected to cost at least $15 billion — would include building two LNG trains, with output of 12 million metric tons per year. Anadarko is hopeful it can benefit from delays with other energy projects and industry-wide cutbacks in capital spending, allowing it to negotiate better prices with contractors and service providers.
Qatari LNG exec predicts strong demand growth
(Asian Oil and Gas; Dec. 6) - Despite recent turbulence, the global market for liquefied natural gas remains strong and continuous demand growth is expected for years to come, said Khalid Sultan R. Al Kuwari, chief marketing and shipping officer of Qatar’s RasGas. Speaking at an LNG conference in Italy, Al Kuwari said a demand growth rate of approximately 5 percent per year from 2015-2025 is anticipated. “During this period, LNG demand is expected to outpace the overall growth in natural gas demand.”
Challenges to the traditional LNG pricing mechanism in Asia, “combined with the recent drop in crude prices and the resurgence of nuclear and coal for power generation has changed the familiar landscape for LNG in Asia and brought into question economics for some new and some planned LNG projects,” he said. “However, new customers and new markets for LNG are also increasing at an ever faster pace. LNG is still a business requiring significant capital investments in production, liquefaction and transportation.”
In October, the CEO of RasGas, Hamad Mubarak Al Muhannadi, told delegates at Gastech in Singapore that the decline in LNG prices and introduction of new suppliers will require a collaborative effort from LNG suppliers and buyers to adopt a sustainable market. “However, if LNG suppliers fail to develop resources required to meet forecasted longer-term demand growth at the right time and place, there will be a supply and demand imbalance with longer-term implications for LNG prices.”
Europe’s move away from coal-fired power plants will benefit gas
(Bloomberg; Dec. 8) - Lawmakers from Germany to the U.K. want to legislate coal out of existence. And as their profit margins slump, power producers too are giving the fuel the cold shoulder in favor of cleaner natural gas. The switch to the less polluting fuel is so far most prominent in the U.K. market. After natural gas prices dropped 26 percent this year, the fuel last month was more profitable than coal in power generation for the first time since 2011, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Gas has also started to displace older coal plants in Germany at times of peak power demand, according to Pira Energy Group, a consultant to the industry. As European nations phase out coal, utilities are so bullish on the future of gas that they are bringing back mothballed plants. “This is a turning point in European power,” said Bruno Brunetti, a senior director of electricity at Pira, who has tracked Europe’s energy markets for 20 years. “This is a structural recovery in gas-plant profitability, not just a random uptick.”
The tide against coal extends beyond power-plant economics. Norway’s $900 billion wealth fund and insurer Allianz SE this year joined investors snubbing the fuel. While it is currently used to generate 41 percent of the world’s electricity, almost twice that of gas, coal’s share will drop to 30 percent by 2040, according to the International Energy Agency in Paris. Britain will phase out its dirtiest coal-fired power plants by 2025 and plans to spur new gas and nuclear stations as replacements.
Low prices help gas overtake coal for U.S. power generation
(EnergyWire; Dec. 9) - Gas-fired power generation is increasingly overtaking coal-fired generation as sustained low prices give the cleaner fuel an edge, federal statistics show. April of this year marked the first month ever in which natural gas outpaced coal in U.S. power generation. But the trend has gathered momentum as July, August and September brought the same dynamic, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's latest short-term energy outlook.
EIA expects that the two fuels will vie for top billing in the nation's electric generation portfolio over the near term, with coal contributing 34 percent to 32 percent for gas on a yearly basis in 2015 and 2016. EIA points to low gas prices as the main driver behind the shift, which saw a 4 percent lead for natural gas over coal in electric generation for September. The agency is predicting the Henry Hub natural gas spot price to average $2.47 per million Btu this winter, down from $3.35 last year.
The combination of lower gas prices and predictions of a generally warmer winter this year than last are expected to bring significant savings for U.S. households that heat with natural gas — an average 13 percent reduction in heating expenses. Nationally, natural gas storage is at an all-time high; inventories touched a record 4.01 trillion cubic feet last month before starting their seasonal decline, EIA data show. Taken together, the trends point to a near term of continued low natural gas prices.
U.S gas production to set new record in 2015
(Reuters; Dec. 8) - The U.S. Energy Information Administration on Dec. 8 said domestic natural gas production in 2015 was expected to reach 79.58 billion cubic feet per day, topping 2014's record 74.89 bcf. It would be the fifth consecutive record year for U.S. gas production. For 2016, the EIA forecasts more records with production rising to 81.05 bcf and consumption to 76.66 bcf. The surplus mostly will go out as pipeline gas to Mexico and LNG from the first Gulf Coast export plant, starting up in January.
The EIA said power sector consumption drove demand growth in 2015, while industrial consumption was flat in 2015 but is expected to increase by 3.9 percent in 2016 with new industrial projects, particularly fertilizer and chemical plants. The agency expects production will increase due to rising drilling efficiency despite low gas prices and fewer drill rigs at work. Most of the production growth is expected to come from the Marcellus Shale as drillers reduce the backlog of uncompleted wells and new pipelines go online.
China’s cut in natural gas prices could deepen losses for importers
(Radio Free Asia; Dec. 7) - China has slashed natural gas prices to boost consumption of the cleaner-burning fuel, but the move may come as a shock to producers that have been struggling with low demand growth this year and importers that lose money on gas sales. China's top planning agency cut wholesale gas prices for non-residential users Nov. 20 by an average of 28 percent, reducing the charge by $3 per 1,000 cubic feet. The agency has been under pressure for months to revise its policies as high natural gas prices have discouraged demand and efforts to curb reliance on high-polluting coal.
Lower prices could speed fuel switching by power producers and industry, easing smog and carbon emissions. The government's goal is to boost the gas share of China's primary energy mix to 10 percent by 2020 from 5.7 percent last year. The target is seen as critical to meeting China's pledges to fight climate change. But the huge price cut, coming after a smaller adjustment in April, will leave some segments of the gas market reeling, raising doubts about whether the policy can be sustained.
"Domestic producers and importers of gas will certainly be hit with losses of billions of U.S. dollars," said Philip Andrews-Speed, principal fellow at the National University of Singapore's Energy Studies Institute. PetroChina, an arm of state-owned China National Petroleum Corp., lost $1.68 billion on gas imports in the first half of this year. The lower prices could have far-reaching consequences, particularly if consumption does not respond to the price cut, leaving producers with high development costs and low sales.
Canadian city council votes for repeal of LNG terminal tax break
(CBC News; Dec. 8) - The City of Saint John will ask the New Brunswick provincial government to repeal a special property tax deal for the Canaport LNG terminal. Council member Shirley McAlary started the debate by introducing a motion to ask the provincial government to repeal the controversial tax deal for Canaport — an LNG import terminal, which its owners are thinking of expanding to export liquefied natural gas. "We've got to start where we have to start," McAlary said. "And that's with the province."
The deal, approved by the provincial legislature in 2005, chopped municipal property taxes on the terminal by more than 90 percent. It fixed the rate at $500,000 per year until 2030. In 2005, the provincial government created special legislation to facilitate the tax deal after an endorsement by the city council. Norm McFarlane, the former Saint John mayor, told council members he had been assured construction of the import terminal could not proceed without the 2005 arrangement.
A report to city council Dec. 7 by John Nugent, the city solicitor, said the terms of the lease arrangement were likely not known at the time of the previous council vote. Already under budget pressure to cut services and lay off staff, city councillors lined up Dec. 7 to support McAlary's motion. "There's a time for giving and there's a time when you can't give any more," said council member John MacKenzie. "And we're at a time when where we need every nickel we can get." The motion passed on a 7-2 vote.
B.C. First Nations have not settled sharing of gas pipeline payments
(Terrace Standard; Terrace, BC; Dec. 9) - Seventeen First Nations spread over more than 600 miles across northern B.C. are struggling to divide as much as $30 million in annual payments from the provincial government should three pipelines carrying natural gas from the northeast to proposed liquefied natural gas export plants on the West Coast ever be built. None of the LNG project developers have committed to start construction, though the province remains hopeful.
An original deadline of June 30 has been extended to Dec. 31 as the First Nations consider a series of detailed options over how much money each should receive. Each of the pipelines — Coastal GasLink to Kitimat for the planned LNG Canada plant, Prince Rupert Gas Transmission to the Prince Rupert area for the Pacific NorthWest LNG plant and the Westcoast Connector to another planned LNG plant at Prince Rupert — would provide the affected First Nations with $10 million a year in provincial payments.
The province originally said it would step in and make decisions on how to divide the money should the First Nations not reach agreements by June 30, but is now giving them more time to come up with their own formula. Allocation issues are the number of miles each line would stretch through each First Nation’s territory, while some question whether they want pipelines constructed at all and some neighboring First Nations have overlapping territorial claims. And some question if any of the pipelines will ever be built.
Renewed U.S. Gulf oil production adding to oversupply
(Wall Street Journal; Dec. 6) - The standoff between major global energy producers that has created an oil glut is set to continue next year in full force, as much because of the U.S. as of OPEC. American shale drillers have only trimmed their pumping a little, and rising oil flows from the Gulf of Mexico are propping up U.S. production. The overall output of U.S. crude is down less than 3 percent, to 9.3 million barrels a day, from the peak in April. Some analysts even see potential for U.S. output to rise next year.
The situation has surprised even seasoned oil traders. “It was anticipated that U.S. shale producers, the source of the explosive growth in supply in recent years, would be the first to fold,” Andrew Hall, chief executive of the commodities hedge fund Astenbeck Capital Management, wrote in a Dec. 1 letter to investors. But the companies slashed costs and developed better techniques to produce more crude and natural gas per well.
Meanwhile, production is growing in the Gulf, where companies spent billions of dollars developing megaprojects that are now starting to produce oil. Just five years after the worst offshore spill in U.S. history shut down drilling in the Gulf, companies are on track to pump about 10 percent more oil than they did in 2014. In September, they produced almost 1.7 million barrels a day. Since most of the money was spent before crude prices cratered, and since pipelines and other infrastructure are already in place, it makes economic sense for the companies to go ahead with the projects despite the glut.
Further spending cuts possible as oil falls below $40
(Wall Street Journal; Dec. 8) - Brent, the global oil benchmark, fell below $40 a barrel for the first time in six years Dec. 8, dipping below what traders say is a key level for the marker used by the world’s oil producers to price their crude. The development is further proof that the oil-price malaise could continue far longer than first forecast by analysts and observers. The psychological impact of sub-$40 Brent could prompt speculators, traders and money managers to start scaling back on investments in the oil sector.
The U.S. West Texas Intermediate benchmark fell below $40 back in August, but many analysts were predicting Brent to stay above $45 as recently as last week. Brent’s dip below $40 for the first time since February 2009 is another marker in the steep decline in crude that followed the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ decision Dec. 4 to keep supply unchanged. The decision sent prices into heavy falls, with shares of energy companies tumbling and analysts scrambling to recalculate their predictions.

Brent is a blend of crudes from several North Sea fields and is the primary reference point for pricing of about two-thirds of the world’s oil. The benchmark typically trades above WTI, which has a lower density. Though producers have scrambled to lessen the impact of falling prices on their businesses, few have prepared for a prolonged period in which oil remains below $40. Such an eventuality will mean the extension of deep spending cuts, project delays and cost-reduction programs.
U.S. shale oil production down 600,000 barrels a day from peak
(Reuters; Dec. 7) - U.S. shale oil production is expected to fall by more than 600,000 barrels per day in January from the March peak, according to a U.S. government forecast Dec. 7, on the back of a global glut that's slashed oil prices to a near seven-year low. Total U.S. output — shale, tight oil and conventional oil — is set to decline by just over 115,000 barrels in January compared with December, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Bakken Shale oil production from North Dakota is set to fall 27,000 barrels, while production from the Eagle Ford is expected to fall by 77,000 barrels a day. Low oil and gas prices have pushed companies to cut back on drilling and production.
About 5% of oil wells in North Dakota are up for sale
(EnergyWire; Dec. 10) – North Dakota's oil production slide paused in October, but state regulators said production could fall more if the price continues to slide, and some companies have begun selling their oil wells in a last-ditch effort to fund their operations. Companies pumped 1.17 million barrels a day in October — about 7,000 a day more than in September but still about 5 percent below the all-time production number set in December 2014, according to data released by the state Dec. 9.
The number of drilling rigs in the state has fallen to 65 this month, down 70 percent from its high in 2012, and another 10 rigs could be shut down if prices continue to drop, Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms said during a conference call with reporters. "We're looking at a lot of belt-tightening, and we're looking at it continuing through the entire first half of 2016," Helms said.
Nationwide, oil prices have fallen almost two-thirds since the summer of 2014 to about $38 a barrel this week. In North Dakota, oil traded for $27 a barrel, largely because of the state's distance from refining centers. About 710 oil wells are up for sale, Helms said, citing records of bond transfers. That's about 5 percent of the wells in the state. About 300 are being sold by Occidental Petroleum, which announced in October it will sell its Bakken Shale operations to concentrate on other fields, Helms said.



12-9-15 The Whole Kit and Caboodle

09 December 2015 9:41am

Senator Lisa Murkowsli, terrorism, oil, Photo by Dave Harbour

From Alaska Headlamp: "Patience Is A Virtue"

Husky to sell Canadian assets.  Calgary Herald by Dan Healing.

EPA and Enviros begin Ak-LNG attack.  Expect more.  -dh

Alaska buys equity in risky 2025 project.

“Understanding ... links between terrorism and the sale of oil into the world market ... we seek to ensure that America and our allies have access to secure and abundant supplies of energy,” said Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski (NGP Photo)

The Whole Kit and Caboodle

Our Commentary.  Thanks to Dan HenningerWall Street Journal, for this brilliant opinion piece.    (i.e. Left column.  We concur with almost all of Henninger's points believing, however, that the Donald Trump comments do not improve the column.)

We would also add that in the energy sector (See last paragraph, below left), a willful attack on the whole kit and caboodle of America's great fossil fuel wealth producing sector has been a major factor in the current American depression. 

Just name the project, and the administration has tried and/or succeeded in waylaying it, for example:

  • Alaska OCS
  • Keystone XL
  • Pebble Mine
  • War on coal
  • Improper use of ESA, CWA, CAA, etc.
  • Sue and settle tactics
  • Mountains of regulations released weekly, in too great a volume for citizens to thoughtfully absorb.

We have documented at length here, the Administration's evasion of: 

  • Constitutional due process protection, 
  • creation of energy project delays, 
  • erection of barriers against energy production,
  • creation of a "climate change" narrative used to justify all manner of alibis for denying or killing job producing, domestic production projects.  

While the current administration has "only" a year left in office, we fear that much more economic, cultural and national defense damage can still be wrought within the new year.  

We would add that many Alaskan citizens are also waking up to the damage being created by a socialistic state administration.

We have seen little effort to date to dramatically slash state spending to meet the demands posed by Alaska's slashed revenue reality -- 90% dependent on low priced oil.

Instead we have experienced an anti-investment climate governor who has on a number of occasions threatened the creation of or increase in taxes on oil investors--major sustainers of the economy.

So today, we expect to see the governor announce cosmetic (i.e. relative to a deficit approaching $4 billion) budget cuts, a variety of new tax initiatives and a reduction in oil investment incentive.  (Announcement just arrived, early afternoon.  We'll have more to offer readers tomorrow.)

In this atmosphere, it is hard to fathom why legislative leaders would willingly agree with the Governor's siren call for state ownership and/or subsidy of gas pipeline and gas utility projects.  We believe it would be both prudent and responsible for elected officials to sell its 25% project equity interest at the earliest opportunity (i.e. to a responsible, private, U.S. investor).

The whole kit and caboodle​ of state decision makers is stepping headlong into risky and wasteful private enterprise projects at a time when their savings accounts are drying up along with oil revenues subject to worldwide price volatility.

Irony is that even if the partially state-owned Ak-LNG project is built on (or, more likely after its scheduled start up date of 2025), that will be too late to meet the financial needs of a crashed state economy.

Furthermore, as elected officials salivate (and, dare we say, "panic") over hoped-for gas pipeline riches they are ignoring other gas pipeline realities:

  • The shale phenomenon and other delayed big-oil & gas projects will still threaten viability of an expensive arctic gas project.  As oil prices gradually increase and exceed the 'production costs' of more feasible gas and LNG projects, the most expensive projects will be the last ones funded--standing in line behind more feasible schemes.
  • Elected officials justify their risky step into the world of private enterprise expecting vast profits.  However, they do not adequately appreciate political risks:
    • With public ownership comes public exposure as special interests bombard Ak-LNG with special interest demands.
    • With public ownership comes public expectation of "affordable" (i.e. always a code word for "subsidized") energy.  Voters will demand that public officials give them "free or low cost" royalty natural gas along the right of way--thus diminishing the cash value of any equity investment.  Voters elsewhere in the state will demand the state provide them with free or subsidized gas --  and the additional barge, air or rail or truck transportation needed to get it to them.   And, since current elected officials are financing the building of a gas distribution system in Fairbanks, Alaska, voters elsewhere will demand the state build LNG or gas storage facilities and distribution systems for their towns/villages.
  • In short, state involvement in energy projects perverts the economic system making it less reliable, deterring future investment, creating more dependence on an unreliable bureaucracy and very likely totally diluting the value of the state equity position.

The best advice we can offer the whole kit and caboodle of Alaska's public officials is to refrain from entering the private sector's barnyard of competition, and do simply what they do best: administer a prudent and reasonable government while encouraging and giving incentives to investors who make a prosperous way of life possible.     -dh

Wall Street Journal EditorialWe are near the end of the seventh year of Barack Obama’s presidency, and by any measure the United States is a fractured nation. Its people are more divided politically than any time in recent memory. Personally, many are anxious, angry or just down.

Whatever Mr. Obama promised in that famous first Inaugural Address, any sense of a nation united and raised up is gone. This isn’t normal second-term blues. It’s a sense of bust.

The formal measure of all this appeared last week with the release of the Pew Research poll, whose headline message is that trust in government is kaput. Forget the old joke about the government coming to “help.” There’s a darker version now: We’re the government, and we’re here to screw you.

In a normal presidential transition year, voters would be excited at the mere prospect of new leadership. Instead, the American people are grasping for straw men.

Donald Trump declared for the presidency in June. The New York City prankster travels from state to state opening the nation’s political fire hydrants, and no one seems able to stop the result: years of pent-up political and cultural contempt pouring into the streets.

Nearly one-third of Barack Obama’s Democratic Party has migrated to aging Socialist Bernie Sanders. Sen. Sanders is evoking press comparisons to the presidential candidacy of Eugene Debs. Today there would be campus riots if a professor’s test asked students to identify Eugene Debs, a famous starched-collar Socialist 115 years ago.

Black Americans, who expected better, live in urban neighborhoods with soaring murder rates, angry marchers and confused police who are utterly alienated from the people they are supposed to protect. Young black men have the worst job prospects of any group in the U.S. The New Republic magazine’s cover this week says: “Why Hillary Clinton will do more for black people than Obama.”

Our political vocabulary is now uniformly stark. Presidential candidates in both parties have built campaigns around income gaps, a struggling middle class, immigrant phobia and back again, the war on terror. One of Mr. Obama’s claimed legacies is he prevented an economic depression in 2009. But we’re still in a depression.

Hope and change was the promise. What happened?

Screens on Kindle readers will crack paging through books explaining what Mr. Obama could have, should have and would have done. For now, the short version is enough: America and the world failed because they didn’t do what Barack Obama told them to do. For seven years, he has been instructing everyone on the “right thing to do.” If Mr. Obama seems down these days, it is because so many—from John Boehner to Vladimir Putin to the man in the street—persisted in doing the wrong thing.

Iran’s ayatollahs got the Obama message, though, and that deal is the legacy.

The other half of the non-domestic legacy is supposed to be climate change. His appearance in Paris this week was Mr. Obama’s last turn on the big global stage, barring a national crisis. Anyone watching the angular figure of the American president making nonstop pleas at the Paris climate summit this week had to be struck by a sense of what the French would call tristesse, a melancholy, even pathetic sadness.

He alone in Paris seemed to take seriously the notion that the climate windmills can be reset to less than 2 degrees Celsius above “preindustrial levels.” In the last of many public apologies for the U.S., Mr. Obama confessed that his own nation is a grievous “emitter.”

Liberals think the right is gloating at Mr. Obama’s end-of-term difficulties. No one is gloating. The nation is either furious (the right) or depressed (the left) at eight wasted, wheel-spinning years whose main achievement is Obama Care—a morass.

Mr. Obama will go off to do something else, but he leaves behind a country littered with public and private institutions in disrepute. Whatever the cumulative causes for this, a president bears responsibility for maintaining some bedrock level of respect for institutions that are the necessary machinery of the nation’s daily life.

Instead, Mr. Obama spent much of his presidency vilifying the private sector—banks, insurers, energy producers and utilities. (Read entire article here.)

Alaska Headlamp News & Comment

Patience is a virtue 

Covered by the Fairbanks Daily News Miner and the Associated Press, Governor Bill Walker said Friday that he didn’t want to hold up a vote to continue work on the AKLNG mega project project while still seeking a commitment from ExxonMobil that he got from two other project partners.

An Exxon spokeswoman, Kim Jordan, said by email that the company has been working to find mutually acceptable terms to advance the project and remains committed to doing so. “We, and many others, have communicated to the state, these agreements take time to negotiate and complete,” Jordan wrote. 

Walker seems to be pointing his finger at ExxonMobil, but the commitment he got from other partners appears to be an agreement to negotiate an agreement? The very fact that ExxonMobil and others voted for the 2016 plan is indicative of their commitment.

$850,000 for what? 

Rigdon Boykin, a commercial attorney, who earned more than $850,000working as a negotiator for the state before his contract with the Alaska Gasline Development Corp. was terminated Nov. 30. Walker wouldn’t rule out bringing Boykin back to the project at some point. But for now, he said, “I don’t really see a role, necessarily, for him.” Asked about what Boykin had accomplished, Walker maintained the state got “its money’s worth Alaskans should be given the details of what work product we got for this money."



08 December 2015 8:58am

THURSDAYDon't miss this update from Caelus Energy's Pat Foley, "Building the next Horizon of Alaska's North Slope Resources!"

News Miner by Max Buxton.  As the state still works Gene Therriault, IEP, Interior Energy Project, Fairbanks, Alaska, gas, AEA, AIDEA, Photo by Dave Harbourout just where it’ll get gas for the Interior, the local utilities and state officials are working through a laundry list of other issues to prepare the Interior for natural gas.

At the top of the list is figuring out what a unified, single gas utility will look like for the Interior after the state bought Fairbanks Natural Gas with plans to merge it with the municipal Interior Gas Utility.

Bill Walker, Alaska Governor, Exxon, ConocoPhillips, Ak-LNG gas commitments, withdrawn partner agreements, Dave Harbour PhotoPlatts.  Alaska Governor Bill Walker said he has commitments from two of three North Slope producers who are partners with the state in the big Alaska LNG Project not to withdraw from the project without offering gas to potential buyers through the project.    ...Walker said BP and ConocoPhillips delivered letters making the assurances to him the day before. ExxonMobil, a third partner in Alaska LNG Project, did not send a letter.  More....

That $52.5 million buy was completed in October, and in addition to Fairbanks Natural Gas, included a liquefaction facility in Port MacKenzie and the trucking company Fairbanks Natural Gas has used.

At the Dec. 3 meeting of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority’s board, Interior Energy Project lead Gene Therriault (NGP Photo) told the members the combination of the two utilities is currently being worked out, but it’s planned to be complete by mid-2016.  More....

Don't miss this update from Caelus Energy's Pat Foley, "Building the next Horizon of Alaska's North Slope Resources!"

There are very few seats remaining. Click here to reserve your seat now.

Event Invitation

Anchorage Breakfast Meeting

Speaker: Caelus Energy's Pat Foley, SVP Alaska Operations 
Topic: Building the next Horizon of Alaska's North Slope Resources

Date:   December 10, 2015
Time:   07:00 AM - 08:00 AM AKST
Location:   Petroleum Club
Email:   info@alaskaalliance.com
Date/Time Details:   7am-8am
Fees/Admission:   $25.00

12-7-15 Pearl Harbor Day: A Personal Story

07 December 2015 11:07am

Remembering Pearl Harbor

Commentary by Dave Harbour

EIA's Alaska production revision....

Calgary Herald.  The province faces strong opposition to its climate change (i.e. Alberta) plan — fuelled by distaste for the carbon tax — according to a new poll that also suggests many Albertans doubt the NDP’s claim the plan will lead to pipeline approvals.

News-Miner opinion: The Alaska Gasline Development Corporation board of directors’ vote to push forward with work on the Alaska LNG pipeline project is a good sign, giving hope that the state’s current oil slump may one day be eased by natural gas production. 

"India is here to ensure that rich countries pay back their debt for overdraft that they have drawn on the carbon space," Indian Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar said. (AP by Karl Ritter and Angela Carlton.  We note  that as in other affairs of state, it is always wise to look beyond the rhetoric and "follow the money" to determine true, political motivations.                 -dh)

Our further commentary: President Obama proclaims that "Climate Change" poses an, "immediate risk to national security", thus shifting emphasis away from immediate terrorism threats.  

Meanwhile, Islamic warriors continue to kill Americans and threaten the future of the country and its way of life.  

Our founders and two centuries of our ancestor-defenders like Col. Dave Harbour created and then protected our freedom and prosperity.  

Would our ancestors not grieve that a continuing lack of resolve by this generation to decisively protect freedom can only result in its loss for future generations?        -dh


12-4-15 Alaska Government Agency Votes To Fund 2016 LNG Project Budget

04 December 2015 2:23am

ADN by Nathaniel Herz.  A state-owned corporation voted unanimously Thursday afternoon to advance the proposed Alaska LNG gas line project for another year, though board members didn't say if Alaska had received long-sought guarantees from three oil company partners to make their gas available if they dropped out of the project. (See AGDC Release)

Marc Langland, retirement, Northrim Bank, Joe Beedle, Joe Schierhorn, Photo by Dave HarbourFriends, family and associates will join Marc Langland (NGP Photo) tonight to celebrate his over 25 years of service to Alaska as co-founder and Chairman of Northrim Bank.

Here is a wonderfully written story by DJ Summers of the Alaska Journal of Commerce:

We add our personal comment, taken from a note sent to a mutual friend today:

"In particular, I can remember visiting my friend, Jim Yarmon, who shared a small office with Marc nearly 30 years ago.  
Marc was carefully orchestrating the Herculean task, of organizing and receiving appropriate regulatory approvals for a new bank.  He was preparing for the post-recession economy beginning with the decade of the 90s.  
I can remember Marc's/Northrim's many important economic conferences. 
I can remember working with Marc's talented and dedicated leadership team over the years as past Chairman of the Alaska Council on Economic Education, Chairman of the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce and an active member of the Alaska Association of Energy Economists, Resource Development Council for Alaska, The United Way, The Alliance and the State Chamber.
There are not many Alaskans who have given so much as has Marc Langland.
He truly deserves induction into the ranks of "Alaska Pioneers" alongside the distinguished but exclusive list of other exceptional Alaskans.
Please pass on my best wishes to Marc and his trusted team for a grand, historical evening.  -dh

"Northrim BanCorp founder, chairman, and former president Marc Langland has announced his retirement at 74 years old, leaving a trail of pluck and forethought in the state’s darker moments that established the second largest Alaska-based bank with $1.5 billion in assets and reputation for service.

"Northrim BanCorp President and CEO Joe Beedle will take over as chairman of the board for both and Northrim BanCorp and Northrim Bank. Chief Operating Officer and Northrim Bank President Joe Schierhorn will fill Langland’s seat on both the Bancorp and Northrim Bank’s boards and take over as CEO of Northrim Bank....  Read more here.

Lisa Murkowski, Federal Government breaks Alaska statehood promises, Photo by Dave HarbourYesterday, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (NGP Photo), called for the federal government to live up to the promises made in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), legislation that was signed into law 35 years ago that has helped protect many of Alaska’s most treasured lands. (Video below)

“The 35th anniversary of ANILCA is an opportunity to examine how the law has – and has not – worked for Alaskans and all Americans. This is also a perfect moment to reassert that the law must be implemented as it was written, not as federal agencies wish it were written. And that means the federal government must honor rural preference, protect subsistence rights, provide Alaskans with access to our lands, and allow us to responsibly develop our resources,” said Murkowski, chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

See our other resource links to the federal government's broken promises to Alaska!  -dh

ANILCA protected over 100 million acres of federal lands in Alaska, doubling the size of the country’s national park and refuge system, and tripling the amount of land designated as wilderness. Overall, the act designated roughly 57 million acres of Alaska as formal wilderness.

In exchange for withdrawing so much of Alaska, ANILCA included a lot of promises with respect to Alaska’s rights, to allow residents access to inholdings, and to provide continued use of federal lands for recreation, hunting, and the pursuit of economic prosperity. Unfortunately, Murkowski said, those promises have not been kept.  See the rest of the story and view other videos of Alaska leaders like Governor Bill Walker and Senator John Coghill....    


AGDC Release:

Late yesterday, the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC) board of directors authorized its management team to vote to approve the 2016 Work Program and Budget for the Alaska LNG Project. AGDC holds the State of Alaska’s equity interest in the integrated liquefied natural gas export project following the state’s $64.6 million acquisition of TransCanada’s midstream interests in the project last month.

Today’s resolution directs AGDC to commit the state to its share of 2016 funding to continue preliminary front-end engineering and design on the $45-$65 billion project to commercialize Alaska’s North Slope natural gas resources. The world class project includes a liquefaction facility in Nikiski on the Kenai Peninsula, an 800-mile pipeline, in-state gas delivery points and a gas treatment plant on Alaska’s North Slope. The project will source gas from the existing Prudhoe Bay and Point Thomson fields.

“This is a monumental occasion for Alaska. Today’s vote is a clear indication of our commitment to get this project built”, said acting board Chairman Dave Cruz. “I want to thank the Governor, his administration, the Legislature, the AGDC team, and our amazing project partners for their hard work in getting us to this point.”

AGDC owns approximately 25% of the Alaska LNG project with partners BP, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil. The venture partners are expected to meet this afternoon to consider the project’s 2016 work program and budget. A unanimous vote of all participants is required to continue preliminary front-end engineering and design for the 2016 calendar year.



03 December 2015 5:58am

Calgary Herald by Stephen Ewart.  After months of speculation about the future of the Alberta Energy Regulator, Premier Rachel Notley has quietly reaffirmed its mandate and will not break up the arms-length government agency that oversees the province’s oil and gas industry.

As we prepare to leave Quito for Anchorage ... (Join us on Facebook for this and other updates), we offer readers Claudia Cattaneo, Secret Meeting, Oil Sands, Producers, Alberta Premier, Dave Harbour Photo from the Financial Post's Claudia Cattaneo (NGP Photo) on more oil companies joining the Enviro-Governmental-Industrial Cabal.  Are the private sector's days numbered?  -dh

ADN by Nathanial Herz.  The head of the Alaska Gasline Development Corp. said his board would approve another year of work Thursday on the state’s share of the proposed $55 billion gas pipeline, even as lawmakers and the industry worry that the project might be doomed.




More coming....









































Claudia Cattaneo, Calgary Herald, Financial Post, Oil Sands, Secret MeetingClaudia Cattaneo (NGP Photo) of the Financial Post has some very intriguing news from the energy sector, from the Calgary Herald.

A hard cap on oilsands emissions that became part of Alberta Premier Rachel Notley’s climate change plan was the product of secret negotiations between four top oilsands companies and four environmental organizations, the Financial Post has learned.

The companies agreed to the cap in exchange for the environmental groups backing down on opposition to oil export pipelines, but the deal left other players on the sidelines, and that has created a deep division in Canada’s oil and gas sector.

Four oilsands leaders — Murray Edwards, the billionaire oil investor and chairman of Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.; Steve Williams, president and CEO of Suncor Energy Inc.; Lorraine Mitchelmore, president of Shell Canada; Brian Ferguson, president and CEO of Cenovus Energy Inc. — stood behind Notley Nov. 22 as she announced an aggressive climate change plan for Alberta. In addition to imposing a $3-billion a year economy-wide carbon tax and phasing out coal-fired electricity generation, the plan strictly caps the oilsands’ share of provincial emissions at 100 megatonnes per year, from about 70 megatonnes today.

The plan is a big part of Canada’s offering to the UN climate change summit under way in Paris.

During the Edmonton announcement, the four leaders praised the plan, with Williams describing it as a “game changer”                  Full report here....

Syndicate content